Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.28 seconds)

Prem Shankar vs State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, ... on 5 September, 2023

5. Accordingly, taking note the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3/Sub Divisional Officer Sadar, District- Lucknow to consider and decide the Case No. 28/26/44/60/2012-2013, Computerized Case No. D-200710460036 (Prem Shankar Vs. State of U.P. and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any adjournment within a period of one year from the next date fixed in the case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Rajeev Pandey And Another vs Prem Shankar on 9 May, 2022

Once the direction as contained in the judgement and order dated 30.7.2019 passed in Writ-C No. 17534 of 2019 (Prem Shankar vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) had been complied with culminating into an order dated 26.10.2020 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bareilly and determination of compensation by the Committee by an order dated 17.1.2022, passing of the order by the learned Single Judge dated 10.3.2022 giving rise to the instant appeal could possibly not have risen in contempt jurisdiction. The order dated 10.3.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge results in expanding the scope of contempt jurisdiction by going behind the direction contained in the order of the Writ Court dated 30.7.2019 contempt, of which, is alleged. If the writ petitioner/applicant/respondent was not satisfied, his remedy lay elsewhere but certainly not by invoking the contempt jurisdiction under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Allahabad High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1