Sudevan.C.C vs Mundur Grama Panchayath
(c) No.30892 of 2012 [Indus Towers Ltd. v. The S.I. Of Police and
Ors.] has, after considering a similar issue, made the following
observations.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)Documents citing
Indus Towers Ltd vs The S.I. Of Police on 29 August, 2011
Palathra Constructions (Pvt) Ltd vs State Of Kerala on 27 September, 2012
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the
petitioner finds it extremely difficult to execute Exts.P2, P5 and
P7 work awarded by the 5th respondent, because of the stiff
opposition and resistance by the local public, taking the law into
their hands. Pursuant to Ext.P13 G.O. and the decision rendered
by the Division Bench of this Court reported in Indus Towers
Ltd. and others Vs. S.I. of Police, Thodupuzha and others
[2014 (4) KHC 81] (paragraph 5), the petitioner has to move
the District Telecom Committee headed by the District Collector
for redressal of the grievance at the first instance. It is
accordingly that Exts.P8, P10 and P11 applications have been
preferred. The delay in considering the same made the petitioner
to approach this Court by way of the present writ petition.
1