Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 46 (1.07 seconds)
Documents citing Ram Kishore vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 18 July, 2007

Ram Singh vs Union Of India & Ors. on 16 March, 2010

20. For calculating the compensation for pecuniary loss of dependency, the multiplier method (multiplier value given in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988  Yearly income of the deceased less the amount spent on himself or herself) is used. This has been adopted in G.M., Kerala SRTC v. Susamma Thomas AIR 1994 SC 1631, Mrs. Sudha Rasheed v. Union of India 1995 (1) SCALE 77, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Trilok Chandra (1996) 4 SCC 362, Smt. Kamla Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ram Kishore v. MCD.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Swarn Singh vs Union Of India & Ors. on 17 March, 2010

26.2 To calculate the compensation for pecuniary loss of dependency, the multiplier method (multiplier value given in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988  Yearly income of the deceased less the amount spent on himself or herself) is used. This is consistent with the procedure adopted in G.M., Kerala SRTC v. Susamma Thomas AIR 1994 SC 1631, Mrs. Sudha Rasheed v. Union of India 1995 (1) SCALE 77, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Trilok Chandra (1996) 4 SCC 362, Smt. Kamla Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Ram Kishore v. MCD and Ashok Sharma v. Union of India.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 20 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Saroj Rani vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi & Ors. on 3 June, 2010

45. To calculate the compensation for pecuniary loss of dependency, the multiplier method (multiplier value given in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988  Yearly income of the deceased less the amount spent on himself or herself) is used. This is consistent with the procedure adopted in G.M., Kerala SRTC v. Susamma Thomas AIR 1994 SC 1631, Mrs. Sudha Rasheed v. Union of India 1995 (1) SCALE 77, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Trilok Chandra (1996) 4 SCC 362, Smt. Kamla Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Ram Kishore v. MCD and Ashok Sharma v. Union of India.
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 38 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Neema Goyal vs Union Of India & Anr. on 4 July, 2011

22. To calculate the compensation for pecuniary loss of dependency, the multiplier method (multiplier value given in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988  Yearly income of the deceased less the amount spent on himself or herself) is used. This is consistent with the procedure adopted in G.M., Kerala SRTC v. Susamma Thomas AIR 1994 SC 1631, Mrs. Sudha Rasheed v. Union of India 1995 (1) SCALE 77, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Trilok Chandra (1996) 4 SCC 362, Smt. Kamla Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Ram Kishore v. MCD, Ashok Sharma v. Union of India, Ram Singh v. Union of India, Swarn Singh v. Union of India and Yogita v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
Delhi High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 1 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Tarun Preet Singh vs Uoi & Anr. on 26 April, 2022

22. To calculate the compensation for pecuniary loss of dependency, the multiplier method (multiplier value given in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 X Yearly income of the deceased less the amount spent on himself or herself) is used. This is consistent with the procedure adopted in G.M., Kerala SRTC v. Susamma Thomas AIR 1994 SC 1631, Mrs. Sudha Rasheed v. Union of India 1995 (1) SCALE 77, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Trilok Chandra (1996) 4 SCC 362, Smt. Kamla Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Ram Kishore v. MCD, Ashok Sharma v. Union of India, Ram Singh v. Union of India, Swarn Singh v. Union of India and Yogita v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
Delhi High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Union Of India vs Dhyan Singh & Ors. on 12 October, 2012

The multiplier method has been accepted as legally sound method for determining compensation in death cases by the Supreme Court in Lata Wadhwa v. State of Bihar, (2001) 8 SCC 1997; Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy, AIR 2012 SC 100 and Delhi High Court in Jaipur Golden Gas Victims Association v. Union of India, 164 RFA No.116/2007 Page 40 of 53 (2009) DLT 346; Nagrik Sangarsh Samiti v. Union of India, MANU/DE/0965/2010; Ram Kishore v. MCD, 2007 (97) DRJ 445; Ashok Sharma v. Union of India, 2009 ACJ 1063.
Delhi High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 8 - J R Midha - Full Document

Smt. Kela Devi vs Raj Kumar on 24 January, 2013

The multiplier method has been accepted as legally sound method for determining compensation in death cases by the Supreme Court in Lata Wadhwa v. State of Bihar, (2001) 8 SCC 1997; Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy, AIR 2012 SC 100 and Delhi High Court in Jaipur Golden Gas Victims Association v. Union of India, 164 (2009) DLT 346; Nagrik Kiran Bansal Date:­ 24/01/2013 SCJ­Cum­RC:East, Delhi Suit No. 176/12 Page 17/22 Sangarsh Samiti v. Union of India, MANU/DE/0965/2010; Ram Kishore v. MCD, 2007 (97) DRJ 445; Ashok Sharma v. Union of India, 2009 ACJ 1063.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next