Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

Raju I vs M/O Railways on 14 November, 2018

5. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he may be given liberty to file a representation to the respondents with regard to his casual labour employment for which the respondents have no objection. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the right of applicant entails from the decision of the Ho'ble Apex Court in the matter of UOI vs. Rakeshkumar (supra). In view of this, the applicant is given liberty to approach once again the respondents with a detailed representation with proof of working as casual labour with the respondents within thirty days from today. . The respondent department may consider and pass a speaking order within 90 days from the date of receipt of a fresh representation from the applicant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs Dilipbhai Arjanbhai Bhokiya on 21 June, 2018

4. Having   gone   through   the   impugned   award   as  well   as   judgment   cited   by   learned   advocate  for the appellant in the case of United India  Insurance Company Limited Vs. Rakeshkumar and  others  reported in (2008) 13 SCC 298 and on  overall   appreciation   of   the   material   on  record as well as the ratio laid down in the  aforesaid   judgment,   coupled   with   the   fact  that   the   victim   is   a   third   party   and   the  driver   of   the   vehicle   involved   in   the  accident   was   not   holding   license   as   he   was  minor   at   the   relevant   time   but,   learned  Tribunal   has   fastened   liability   upon   the  Insurance   Company   at   the   interim   stage.  However, such clear finding as to whether the  driver of the vehicle in question was dully  licensed or not, can only be recorded after  the full­fledged trial of the Claim Petition  as such.
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R M Chhaya - Full Document
1