Raju I vs M/O Railways on 14 November, 2018
5. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he may be given liberty
to file a representation to the respondents with regard to his casual labour employment for
which the respondents have no objection. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that
the right of applicant entails from the decision of the Ho'ble Apex Court in the matter of
UOI vs. Rakeshkumar (supra). In view of this, the applicant is given liberty to approach
once again the respondents with a detailed representation with proof of working as casual
labour with the respondents within thirty days from today. . The respondent department
may consider and pass a speaking order within 90 days from the date of receipt of a fresh
representation from the applicant.