Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.61 seconds)
Documents citing Ashok Kumar Gupta (Dead ) Through Lrs vs Smt. Gauri Bagchi 32 Cont/1196/2019 ... on 28 February, 2020

Rocky Gupta vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 21 August, 2025

"(i) issue an order in the nature of certiorari setting aside the summoning order dated 21.01.2019 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial magistrate, Court No.1, Mainpuri and order dated 25.02.2020 passed by Sessions judge, Mainpuri in Criminal Revision No.10/2020 (Deepak Gupta v. Poonam and another) as well as quash the entire criminal proceeding of Case No.638/2020 (State v. Rockey Gupta and another) arising out of Case Crime No.0281 of 2017, under Section 307 IPC, Police Station- Aunchha, District- Mainpuri, pending in the court of learned ACJM, Court No.1, Mainpuri, on the basis of compromise filed by opposite party nos.2 and 3.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - D Pathak - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs Neetu on 17 January, 2023

1. The present revision petition under Section 397read with Section 401of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") has been filed by petitioner assailing the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, South District, Saket Court, New Delhi ("Appellate Court") in the matter of "Ashok Kumar vs. Neetu" in appeal C.A. No. 54/2022vide which the challenge to order dated 09.02.2022 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistarte-04, Mahila Court-South, Saket Courts, New Delhi ("Trial Court") in CT No. 317912020 tilted as "Neetu Vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors." was dismissed.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Saw @ Sanjay Kumar Sao vs The State Of Jharkhand on 13 December, 2021

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner has put reliance on the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of "Ashok Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors." [W.P.(C) No. 2725 of 2001]. It was held in the said case that the confiscating authority had committed error in not determining the vital issue as to whether the stone chips was being removed from the raiyati land or from the forest land. The prosecution report prepared by the Forester could not have been treated as sacrosanct so as not to make any enquiry from his level with regard to the place of mining.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Shankar - Full Document

Gaurav Rai vs State Of U.P. And Another on 12 October, 2023

2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the summoning order dated 02.01.2021; non bailable warrant dated 19.08.2023 as well as the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.349 of 2020 (Ashok Sharma Vs. Gaurav Rai) under Section 138 N.I. Act, P.S. Nai Ki Mandi, District Agra, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Agra.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - D Verma - Full Document
1