Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

Bhajinder Singh & Ors vs Jaspal Singh & Ors on 7 May, 2018

6. The counsel for the contesting respondents places reliance, inter alia, on Shyam Sundar Rakshit Vs. Satchidananda Rakshit and Anr., AIR 1955 Calcutta 351, Sahib Zada Adbul Bais Khan Vs. Budh Singh Bapna, AIR 1973 Rajasthan 201 and Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur and Ors. Vs. Barkat Khan, 2003 AlHC 818. His argument is that the application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC having been submitted at the stage when the suit was still pending and the order, the breach of which is alleged was then still operative, the proceedings cannot be scuttled in the manner sought to be done, the cause of action to secure due obedience having survived the death of Didar Singh.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R K Gauba - Full Document

G.J. Joseph vs T.S. Babu Rao And Ors. on 8 November, 2002

40. The High Court of Calcutta in the case of Shyam Sundar v. Satchidananda Rakshit, , has held that the punishment should be primarily for upholding the dignity of the Court and maintaining due respect for the administration of justice and there should be no element of vindictiveness in it and it should not be allowed to be used for feeding fat private grudge or as an offensive weapon to satisfy private vendetta.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1