Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (1.27 seconds)
Documents citing Kaulchand H Jogani vs Shree Vardhan Investment And 6 Ors on 10 November, 2022

Exclusive Capital Ltd vs Silver And C.Z. International on 2 May, 2025

In support of his submission, he places reliance on the Judgment of this Court in Chandra Kishore Chaurasia v. R.A. Perfumery Works Pvt. Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine Del 3529; the Judgment of the Bombay High Court in Kaulchand H. Jogani v. Shree Vardhan Investment & Ors., 2022 SCC OnLine Bom 4752; and the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D.Keerthi, (2024) 5 SCC 815.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document

Exclusive Capital Limited vs Clover Media Private Limited & Ors on 4 August, 2025

51. It is equally pertinent to refer to the decision of the High Court of Bombay in Kaulchand H. Jogani v. Shree Vardhan Investment16, which has been approved by the Supreme Court in Yamini Manohar and which settles the debate regarding the conduct of inquiry by Court with respect to justifiability in the claim for urgent interim relief. Paragraphs 28 to 31 of Kaulchand read as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Asa International India Microfinance ... vs Northern Arc Capital Ltd. & Anr on 17 January, 2025

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme court in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Tripathi, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1382 in approving the decision in Kaulchand H. Jogani (supra) has indicated the duty of the Court in accepting a plaint with the prayer for urgent relief in paragraph 9 of the Judgment. The relevant observations in this regard are reproduced below:
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Sen - Full Document
1   2 Next