Vishwa Nath Singh vs State Of U.P.Thru Secy.,Revenue ... on 28 February, 2020
7. The aforesaid judgments of this court are clearly applicable in the present case with regard to charges 1 to 4 since the inquiry report does not indicate the circumstances for low recovery by the petitioner. Even otherwise as has been held in the case of Ram Raj Singh (supra) that under recovery of arrears of land revenue do not constitute misconduct. As such finding petitioner guilty of charges 1 to 4 is clearly against the dictum of this court.