Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 August, 2017

State Of Maharashtra Thr. Deputy ... vs Shri Narayan S/O Shri Shivram Mataghare on 24 November, 2025

"19. Inspector Satpal (PW 2), who was the shadow witness, after reiterating the statement of the complainant with regard to the pre-trap proceedings, stated that he along with the complainant on that day met the original accused and followed to his quarter in the building of the police station whereafter the original accused enquired of the complainant as to whether he had brought the money, on which, the latter handed over three currency notes denomination of Rs 500 and five currency notes of Rs 100 each to him and that he kept the same in a cardboard box lying near him. The witness stated that he then gave a signal to the other members of the raiding party including the DSP (Vigilance) who entered the room and undertook the steps pertaining to recovery and seizure as narrated by the complainant. Further, in the case of Dattatraya S/o. Rajaram Thaokar (supra) and Mir Mustafa Ali Hasmi (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deelip Kishanrao Dhutmal vs State Of Mah on 7 August, 2024

20. Thus, there is variance in the evidence of the witness on the material point i.e. preparation of panchanama Exh.21 and secondly about taking out of notes from the pocket of the accused. Another basic question is as to whether merely utterance the words that have your brought the amount whether is sufficient to hold that it was amount of bribe. The answer in view of the judgment in the case of Dattatraya (supra) is 'no'. So far as the sanction in view of the judgment this court is also persuaded to hold that sanction is without application of mind. On this count, this court finds that prosecution has failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubts. This court thus finds that the impugned judgment and order dated 06-05-2005 deserves to be quashed and set aside by acquitting the accused of the charges. Hence, the following order:-
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1