Koshy Varghese @ Geevarghese Koshy vs State Of Kerala on 30 September, 2013
8. We shall now consider whether, as contended by the appellant,
the reference court erred in denying interest under section 28 of the Act
to him during the period from 24.05.2003 to 01.03.2012. As stated
earlier, this was done pursuant to and in terms of the order of remand
passed by this court on 01.03.2012 in L.A.A. No. 794 of 2005. The
L.A.A. No. 506/2014 -10-
learned counsel, relying on the decision of the Apex Court in Susamma
Baby v. State of Kerala and another1, contended that this court could
not have imposed such a condition in the order of remand. We are of
the opinion that having regard to the stipulations contained in sub-
section (2) of section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this court
cannot, in an appeal from the revised award passed pursuant to the
order of remand, take a contrary view and hold that the appellant is
entitled to interest under section 28 of the Act even during the said
period.