Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (2.96 seconds)

Union Territory vs Prabhjot Singh on 26 March, 2009

125. R.F.A. No. 2684 of 2005 and Cross Objections No. 11-CI of 2008 Union Territory, Chandigarh and others .. Appellants vs Amarjit Kaur and another .. Respondents RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [15] 126. R.F.A. No. 2685 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Amarjit Singh and others .. Respondents 127. R.F.A. No. 2686 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Shanti Devi and another .. Respondents 128. R.F.A. No. 2687 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Sardara Singh and others .. Respondents 129. R.F.A. No. 2688 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Gurcharan Singh and others .. Respondents 130. R.F.A. No. 2689 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Amarjit Singh and others .. Respondents 131. R.F.A. No. 2690 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Sardara Singh and others .. Respondents 132. R.F.A. No. 2691 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Labh Singh .. Respondent 133. R.F.A. No. 2692 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Surjan Singh and others .. Respondents 134. R.F.A. No. 2693 of 2005 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Sardara Singh and others .. Respondents RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [16] 135. R.F.A. No. 2796 of 2005 Gurcharan Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 136. R.F.A. No. 2272 of 2006 Nasib Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 137. R.F.A. No. 2273 of 2006 Ajaib Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 138. R.F.A. No. 2274 of 2006 Daljit Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 139. R.F.A. No. 2275 of 2006 Harpreet Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 140. R.F.A. No. 2398 of 2006 Gurjit Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 141. R.F.A. No. 2399 of 2006 Amarjit Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 142. R.F.A. No. 2400 of 2006 Harbans Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 143. R.F.A. No. 2401 of 2006 Laik Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [17] 144. R.F.A. No. 2402 of 2006 Balbir Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 145. R.F.A. No. 2415 of 2006 Sardara Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 146. R.F.A. No. 2632 of 2006 Dev Kumar and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 147. R.F.A. No. 3241 of 2006 Gurdev Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 148. R.F.A. No. 4058 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Jit Singh and others .. Respondents 149. R.F.A. No. 4059 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Dev Kumar and others .. Respondents 150. R.F.A. No. 4060 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Gurjit Singh .. Respondent 151. R.F.A. No. 4061 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Harpreet Singh .. Respondent 152. R.F.A. No. 4062 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Balbir Singh and others .. Respondents RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [18] 153. R.F.A. No. 4063 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Harbans Singh and another .. Respondents 154. R.F.A. No. 4064 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Nasib Singh and others .. Respondents 155. R.F.A. No. 4065 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Sardara Singh and others .. Respondents 156. R.F.A. No. 4066 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Daljit Singh and another .. Respondents 157. R.F.A. No. 4067 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Amarjit Singh and others .. Respondents 158. R.F.A. No. 4068 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Ajaib Singh and another .. Respondents 159. R.F.A. No. 4355 of 2006 Sucha Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 160. R.F.A. No. 4447 of 2006 Surmukh Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 161. R.F.A. No. 4465 of 2006 Gurjit Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [19] 162. R.F.A. No. 4704 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Gurjit Singh .. Respondent 163. R.F.A. No. 4705 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Surmukh Singh and another .. Respondents 164. R.F.A. No. 4706 of 2006 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Sucha Singh and others .. Respondents 165. R.F.A. No. 1058 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Jumla Malkan Raqsab Hassab Zar Khewat and Hasab Rasad Khewat .. Respondent 166. R.F.A. No. 1523 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Kamal Jatinder Singh .. Respondent 167. R.F.A. No. 1524 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Ram Lubhaya .. Respondent 168. R.F.A. No. 1525 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Surjit Kaur and another .. Respondents 169. R.F.A. No. 1526 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Ravi Nandan and others .. Respondents 170. R.F.A. No. 2001 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Hemant Kumari Sharma and others .. Respondents RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [20] 171. R.F.A. No. 2002 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Deep Singh and others .. Respondents 172. R.F.A. No. 2003 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Sarita Chaudhary .. Respondent 173. R.F.A. No. 2004 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Smt. Saroj Rani .. Respondent 174. R.F.A. No. 2005 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Daulat Kaur and others .. Respondents 175. R.F.A. No. 2006 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Amar Singh and others .. Respondents 176. R.F.A. No. 2007 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Jagdish .. Respondent 177. R.F.A. No. 2008 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Anil Kumar and others .. Respondents 178. R.F.A. No. 2009 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Avtar Singh and another .. Respondents 179. R.F.A. No. 2010 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Premayukat .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [21] 180. R.F.A. No. 2011 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Dharamvir Narad .. Respondent 181. R.F.A. No. 2012 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Ram Sarup .. Respondent 182. R.F.A. No. 2013 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Raghbur Dass alias Raghbar Dayal .. Respondent 183. R.F.A. No. 2014 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Malkit Kaur .. Respondent 184. R.F.A. No. 2247 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Ramesh Kumar .. Respondent 185. R.F.A. No. 2248 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Rajesh Kumar and another .. Respondents 186. R.F.A. No. 2249 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Madan Mohan .. Respondent 187. R.F.A. No. 2265 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Jagjiwan Kumar and another .. Respondents 188. R.F.A. No. 2266 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Jumla Malkan .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [22] 189. R.F.A. No. 2294 of 2007 Dharamvir Narad .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 190. R.F.A. No. 2295 of 2007 Naresh Kumar Sharma and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 191. R.F.A. No. 2296 of 2007 Anil Kumar and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 192. R.F.A. No. 2297 of 2007 Amar Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 193. R.F.A. No. 2298 of 2007 Avtar Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 194. R.F.A. No. 2299 of 2007 Smt. Saroj Rani .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 195. R.F.A. No. 2300 of 2007 Malkit Kaur .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 196. R.F.A. No. 2301 of 2007 Madan Mohan .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 197. R.F.A. No. 2302 of 2007 Jagdish .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [23] 198. R.F.A. No. 2303 of 2007 Anil Kumar and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 199. R.F.A. No. 2304 of 2007 Jumla Malkan .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 200. R.F.A. No. 2305 of 2007 Rajesh Kumar and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 201. R.F.A. No. 2306 of 2007 Ramesh Kumar .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 202. R.F.A. No. 2307 of 2007 Krishan Kumar and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 203. R.F.A. No. 2405 of 2007 Raghbur Dass alias Raghbar Dayal .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 204. R.F.A. No. 2406 of 2007 Premayukat .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 205. R.F.A. No. 2555 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Labh Singh .. Respondent 206. R.F.A. No. 2556 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Hari Kishan .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [24] 207. R.F.A. No. 2557 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Smt. Surinder Kaur and another .. Respondents 208. R.F.A. No. 2821 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Shamlat Deh .. Respondent 209. R.F.A. No. 2839 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Anil Kumar and another .. Respondents 210. R.F.A. No. 3187 of 2007 Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Appellant vs Om Parkash .. Respondent 211. R.F.A. No. 3909 of 2007 Shamlat Deh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and others .. Respondents 212. R.F.A. No. 4534 of 2007 Jagjiwan Kumar and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 213. R.F.A. No. 4535 of 2007 Angrej Kaur and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 214. R.F.A. No. 312 of 2008 Karam Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 215. R.F.A. No. 313 of 2008 Kartar Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [25] 216. R.F.A. No. 314 of 2008 Balwant Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 217. R.F.A. No. 315 of 2008 Surjan Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 218. R.F.A. No. 316 of 2008 Jaswinder Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 219. R.F.A. No. 317 of 2008 Mastan Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 220. R.F.A. No. 318 of 2008 Karam Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 221. R.F.A. No. 319 of 2008 Surjan Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 222. R.F.A. No. 320 of 2008 Surjan Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 223. R.F.A. No. 321 of 2008 Karam Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 224. R.F.A. No. 322 of 2008 Balbir Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [26] 225. R.F.A. No. 323 of 2008 Kaka Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 226. R.F.A. No. 324 of 2008 Kaka Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 227. R.F.A. No. 325 of 2008 Baldev Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 228. R.F.A. No. 326 of 2008 Baldev Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 229. R.F.A. No. 327 of 2008 Baldev Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 230. R.F.A. No. 328 of 2008 Nirmal Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 231. R.F.A. No. 329 of 2008 Surjan Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 232. R.F.A. No. 330 of 2008 Daulat Kaur and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 233. R.F.A. No. 331 of 2008 Angrej Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [27] 234. R.F.A. No. 332 of 2008 Shyam Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 235. R.F.A. No. 333 of 2008 Hari Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 236. R.F.A. No. 334 of 2008 Amrik Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 237. R.F.A. No. 335 of 2008 Surinder Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 238. R.F.A. No. 336 of 2008 Baldev Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 239. R.F.A. No. 337 of 2008 Labh Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 240. R.F.A. No. 338 of 2008 Bawa Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 241. R.F.A. No. 339 of 2008 Labh Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 242. R.F.A. No. 340 of 2008 Nirmal Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [28] 243. R.F.A. No. 341 of 2008 Nirmal Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 244. R.F.A. No. 342 of 2008 Kaka Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 245. R.F.A. No. 343 of 2008 Karam Singh .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 246. R.F.A. No. 344 of 2008 Balwant Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 247. R.F.A. No. 345 of 2008 Hari Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 248. R.F.A. No. 346 of 2008 Kaur Chand and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 249. R.F.A. No. 347 of 2008 Amarjit Kaur .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 250. R.F.A. No. 348 of 2008 Avtar Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 251. R.F.A. No. 349 of 2008 Piara Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [29] 252. R.F.A. No. 350 of 2008 Piara Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 253. R.F.A. No. 351 of 2008 Garib Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 254. R.F.A. No. 352 of 2008 Garib Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 255. R.F.A. No. 353 of 2008 Piara Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 256. R.F.A. No. 354 of 2008 Piara Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 257. R.F.A. No. 355 of 2008 Piara Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 258. R.F.A. No. 404 of 2008 Mohinder Singh and another .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 259. R.F.A. No. 709 of 2008 Bhag Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent 260. R.F.A. No. 710 of 2008 Bhag Singh and others .. Appellants vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent RFA No. 2632 of 2005 [30] 261. R.F.A. No. 2009 of 2008 Sarita Chaudhary .. Appellant vs Union Territory, Chandigarh .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. G. S. Punia, Mr. Hardip Singh, Mr. R. K. Dhiman, Mr. P. C. Dhiman and Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocates for the land owners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 14 - R Bindal - Full Document

Swami Vasudevanand Saraswati Disciple ... vs Jagat Guru Shankarcharya Jyotishpeeth ... on 22 September, 2017

Allahabad High Court Cites 273 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Rajasthan State Industrial ... vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 17 December, 1984

17. From a review of the above case law, it would appear that for all purposes the award has to be considered as a decree. So for purpose of appeal as well, the award would be taken to be a decree and ad valorem court-fee, therefore, is payable under Schedule I Article 1 and the Court-fee is not payable when the award is a decree under Schedule II, Article 3 of the Act. The charging section under the Act is Section 20 and Court-fee can be leviable either under the various chapters or under the Schedules. Even when there is no specific section for computation of court-fees in a matter like the present one, then Schedule I, Article 1 as it applies to a case like the present one, can be made applicable. Section 20 of the Act provides that the fee payable under this Act shall be determined or computed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV, Chapter VI, Chapter VIII and Schedules I and II. So wherever any of these provisions is applicable, then fee has to be paid accordingly.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 32 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1