Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing Kamla Chopra vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India And ... on 6 December, 1973

Dhatri Pandey vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 7 February, 2026

(1) Smt. Kamla Chopra v. Life Insurance Corporation of India reported as 1973 SCC online Delhi 244; (2) Prestolite of India Ltd. v. General Insurance Corp. of India & Anr. reported as ILR (2008) 1 Delhi 1024; (3) Exports Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. v. Garg Sons International reported as (2014) 1 SCC 686; (4) Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Anita Panwar reported as (2016) SCC Online 1807;
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs Smt. Iqbal Kaur And Ors. on 24 June, 1983

10. The authority viz., Smt Kamla Chopra v. Life insurance Corporation of India, AIR 1975 Delhi 15, relied upon by Mr. Malhotra is clearly distinguishable on facts. In that case, jurisdiction of the Delhi Court, in which she had instituted her suit, was sought to be defended by the plaintiff on two grounds: firstly, that refusal to pay the insurance money was made by the defendant company at Delhi, and secondly, that the defendant company had also its Divisional Office in Delhi. So far as the first ground was concerned, it was held that refusal to pay did not constitute a part of the cause of action, for, to get such a claim, it was not necessary, to show as to whether the same was refused by the defendant Company. So far as the second ground was concerned, it was held that since no part of the cause of action had admittedly arisen in Delhi, as such, Explanation II to Section 20 did not apply to give jurisdiction to the Delhi Court. This authority is thus of no avail to Mr. Malhotra.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Anant Raj Industries Ltd. vs Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. on 20 February, 2003

11. A single Judge of this Court has in Kamla Chopra vs. L.I.C. of India , found it irrelevant that the repudiation of the liability under an insurance policy took place in Delhi. Avadh Behari, J. held that the Suit that involved the question of liability under the policy issued at Kanpur and Varanasi could have been filed either at Kanpur or Varanasi where the policies were issued or at Bombay where L.I.C. has its principal office. The repudiation of liability at Delhi was found not to provide the cause of action and since Delhi was not the principal office, it lacked territorial jurisdiction.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - V Sen - Full Document

Gammon India Pvt. Ltd vs Deepak Rana on 14 February, 2014

7. It is further argued by the counsel for appellant/defendant that entire case of the respondent/plaintiff is on assumptions and without any document or even any averment to substantiate. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the order and decree dt. 27/11/2012 is liable to be set aside. Counsel for appellant has also relied upon the judgments of Patel Road ways Ltd. Vs. Prasad Trading Corporation (AIR1992 SC 1514), Tata Motors Ltd. Vs. JSC VTB Bank Ltd. 2012(130) DRJ142, Kamla Chopra Vs. Life Insurance Corporation AIR 1975 Delhi 15, Gujarat Insecticides V Jainson Mineral & Anr (2009) 153, PLR 1.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1