Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (1.95 seconds)
Documents citing R.E. Muhammad Qasim Ravuther vs R.G. Nagaraja Moopanar And Ors. on 28 April, 1927

Muniammal vs P.M. Ranganatha Nayagar And Anr. on 11 October, 1954

19. The principles which should guide Indian Courts in the appointment of a Receiver are three in number. Eirst of all, a plaintiff applying for the appointment of a Receiver must show 'prima facie' that he has a strong case and good tide to the property or a special equity in his favour and that the property in the hands of the defendent is in danger of being wasted; --'Muhammad Qasim Ravather v. Nagaraja Moopanar', AIR 1928 Mad 813 at p. 814 (Z13). It is not enough for the plaintiff to show that he has a fair question to raise as to the extent of the right alleged as in the case of a temporary injunction, but he must go further and make out that he has a good 'prima facie' title requiring Court's protection and safeguarding pending litigation and which must be made out on the facts of that particular case.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

K.Sandhya Aged 40 Years vs K.K.Sivakumar

(2) The Court should not appoint a receiver except upon proof by the plaintiff that prima facie he has very excellent chance of succeeding in the suit. - 'Dhumi v. Nawab Sajjad Ali Khan', AIR 1923 Lah 623 (Z16); - 'Firm of Raghubir Singh Jaswant v. Narinjan Singh', AIR 1923 Lah 48 (Z17); - 'Siaram Das v, Mohabir Das', 27 Cal 279 (Z18); - 'Muhammad Kasim v. Nagaraja Moopanar', AIR 1928 Mad 813 (Z19); - 'Banwarilal Chowdhury v. Motilal', AIR 1922 Pat 493 (Z20).
Kerala High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A Dominic - Full Document

Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University Of vs Rt on 31 March, 2016

"19. The principles which should guide Indian Courts in the appointment of a Receiver are three in number. First of all, a plaintiff applying for the appointment of a Receiver must show 'prima facie' that he has a strong case and good tide to the property or a special equity in his favour and that the ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:01:34 :::HCHP 16 property in the hands of the defendant is in danger of being wasted; ­­'Muhammad Qasim Ravather v. Nagaraja Moopanar', AIR 1928 Mad .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Haripriya Mann vs Smt. Sonal Chaudhri & Ors on 4 November, 2023

"19. The principles which should guide Indian Courts in the appointment of a Receiver are three in number. First of all, a plaintiff applying for the appointment of a Receiver must show 'prima facie' that he has a strong case and good tide to the property or a special equity in his favour and that the property in the hands of the defendant is in danger of being wasted; -'Muhammad Qasim Ravather v. Nagaraja Moopanar', AIR 1928 Mad 813 at p. 814 (Z13). It is not enough for the plaintiff to show that he has a fair question to raise ::: Downloaded on - 08/11/2023 20:31:13 :::CIS 27 as to the extent of the right alleged as in the case of a temporary 617 injunction, but he must go further and make out that he has a good 'prima facie' title requiring Court's protection and safeguarding pending litigation and which must be made out on the facts of that particular case.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V Singh - Full Document

Haripriya Mann vs Smt. Sonal Chaudhri & Ors on 4 November, 2023

"19. The principles which should guide Indian Courts in the appointment of a Receiver are three in number. First of all, a plaintiff applying for the appointment of a Receiver must show 'prima facie' that he has a strong case and good tide to the property or a special equity in his favour and that the property in the hands of the defendant is in danger of being wasted; -'Muhammad Qasim Ravather v. Nagaraja Moopanar', AIR 1928 Mad 813 at p. 814 (Z13). It is not enough for the plaintiff to show that he has a fair question to raise ::: Downloaded on - 08/11/2023 20:31:14 :::CIS 27 as to the extent of the right alleged as in the case of a temporary 617 injunction, but he must go further and make out that he has a good 'prima facie' title requiring Court's protection and safeguarding pending litigation and which must be made out on the facts of that particular case.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V Singh - Full Document

Satish Chander Yadav (Thr Lrs) & Ors vs Lt Col Gaj Singh Through Lrs & Ors on 22 December, 2023

(2) The Court should not appoint a receiver except upon proof by the plaintiff that prima facie; he has very excellent chance of succeeding in the S. suit. -- „Dhumi v. Nawab Sajjad Ali Khan‟, AIR 1923 Lah 623 (Z16); -- „Firm of Raghubir Singh Jaswant v. Narinjan Singh‟, AIR 1923 Lah 48 (Z17); -- „Siaram Das v. Mohabir Das‟, 27 Cal 279 (Z18); -- „Muhammad Kasim v. Nagaraja Moopanar‟, AIR 1928 Mad 813 (Z19); -- „Banwarilal Chowdhury v. Motilal‟, AIR 1922 Pat 493 (Z20).
Delhi High Court Cites 98 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Committee Of Management Anjuman ... vs Shailendra Kumar Pathak Vyas And ... on 26 February, 2024

(2) The Court should not appoint a receiver except upon proof by the plaintiff that prima facie he has very excellent chance of succeeding in the S. suit. -- 'Dhumi v. Nawab Sajjad Ali Khan', AIR 1923 Lah 623 (Z16); -- 'Firm of Raghubir Singh Jaswant v. Narinjan Singh', AIR 1923 Lah 48 (Z17); -- 'Siaram Das v. Mohabir Das', 27 Cal 279 (Z18); -- 'Muhammad Kasim v. Nagaraja Moopanar', AIR 1928 Mad 813 (Z19); -- 'Banwarilal Chowdhury v. Motilal', AIR 1922 Pat 493 (Z20).
Allahabad High Court Cites 76 - Cited by 0 - R R Agarwal - Full Document
1   2 3 Next