In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. and
Ors. (AIR 1990 SC 79), it was laid down that
when a case rests upon circumstantial evidence,
such evidence must satisfy the following tests:
In Padala Veera
Reddy vs. State of A.P. And Ors. 1989 Supp. (2) SCC 706 it
was laid down that in a case of circumstantial evidence, the
evidence adduced by the prosecution must satisfy the
following conditions:
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P.,
AIR 1990 SC 79 it was laid down that when a case
rests upon circumstantial evidence, such evidence
must satisfy the following tests:
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. and
Ors. (AIR 1990 SC 79), it was laid down that
when a case rests upon circumstantial evidence,
such evidence must satisfy the following tests:
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. and
Ors. (AIR 1990 SC 79), it was laid down that
when a case rests upon circumstantial evidence,
such evidence must satisfy the following tests:
"(1) the circumstances from which an inference
of guilt is sought to be drawn, must be cogently
and firmly established;
30. The following tests laid down inPadala Veera
Reddy v. State of A.P. also need to be kept in mind: (SCC
pp. 710-11, para 10)
"10. (1) the circumstances from which an inference
of guilt is sought to be drawn, must be cogently and
firmly established;
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. and
Ors. (AIR 1990 SC 79), it was laid down that
when a case rests upon circumstantial evidence,
such evidence must satisfy the following tests:
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. and
Ors. (AIR 1990 SC 79), it was laid down that
when a case rests upon circumstantial
evidence, such evidence must satisfy the
following tests: