Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)

C.Raja vs M.Sridevi @ Kalpana on 23 January, 2024

In such circumstances, the law laid down by this Court in the case of B.Gajendran Vs Adhilakshmi in C.R.P.No.142 of 2013 and C.Raja Vs M.Sridevi @ Kalpana reported in CDJ 2023 MHC 4001 are squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed by striking off the plaint in the suit filed by the respondent in O.S.No.296 of 2015 as there is a jurisdictional error in entertaining the suit. 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D.Thangaraj Pandian vs V.Chandrakumar

In the judgment relied on by the petitioners in C.R.P.No.926 of 2016 of this Court (C.Raja vs. M.Sridevi @ Kalpana), wife filed the suit for a permanent injunction against the husband restraining him from alienating his property, so a reference was made before the Division Bench of this Court. In that reference, it was observed that the Family https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/7 Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.283 of 2024 Court has no jurisdiction U/s.7 of the Family Court Act, to entertain the suit filed by the wife against the husband for perpetual injunction in respect of his property. But, the facts of the case on hand are entirely different. There is a dispute between the husband and wife in respect of the suit property, moreover, the wife alienated the suit properties to the petitioners during the pendency of divorce proceedings. In the above facts and circumstances, this Court comes to the conclusion that this petition has no valid reason to transfer the suit from the Family Court, Madurai to any other civil Court in Madurai or Ramanathapuram.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1