Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing P.V. Kapoor And Anr. vs Union Of India And Anr. on 6 September, 1991

Dr. Raja Ram vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 26 February, 1998

In the case of V.P. Kapoor v. Union of India and Anr., (1994) 27 A.T.C. 383, the learned counsel for the respondents quoted the observation of the apex Court cited in para-16 of the judgment in the case of E.S. Reddy v. Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, in support of his contention that the predecessor of the applicant was also placed under suspension as was done in the case cited in the aforesaid judgment.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

R.N. Sharma vs Union Of India on 3 December, 1999

3. On 1st October, 1990, the petitioner filed a complaint with SHO, Vinay Nagar Police Station to investigate the incident of shooting in Sarojini Nagar area which had caused death of his son. It is the case of the petitioner that the newspaper reported the filing of a public interest petition being Civil Writ Petition No. 3393 of 1990 (P.V. Kapur and another Vs. Union of India) in the Delhi High Court for adjudication upon action of police firing in INA Market and Sarojini Nagar. The petitioner, therefore, with leave of the court, filed an affidavit narrating the incident which took place on 25th September, 1990, at Sarojini Nagar and sought various reliefs from the court including that criminal proceedings be initiated against those police officers found responsible for the death of his son.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - R S Sodhi - Full Document

S. Sivagami vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors. on 9 August, 2001

3. Mr. V. Ayyathurai, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the police firing was indiscriminate without even proper warning and following the procedures before firing is ordered. In fact, before firing there was no lathi charge and not even a warning to the crowd was given. Therefore, the learned Counsel submitted that based upon the judgment of Delhi High Court reported in 1992 Cri LJ 128 (P.V. Kapoor v. Union of India) the petitioner is erititled to compensation as prayed for.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - D Murugesan - Full Document
1