Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing Nagamalai Thevar vs Pandaram And Anr. on 10 February, 1977

Dhudku Ganpat Mahajan vs Prabhakar Madhavrao Deshpande on 16 August, 2012

e. The delivery of symbolical possession U/O 21 Rule 96 of the C. P. C. as distinguished from actual possession U/O 21 Rule 95 arrest the continuity of adverse possession. The learned counsel relies on the judgment of the Apex Court in a case of Mamidi Venkata Satyanarayana Manikyalarao and another Vs. Mandela Narasimhaswami and others reported in AIR 1966 SC 470 and in a case of Nagamalai Thevar Vs. Pandaram and another reported in AIR 1977 Madras 347.
Bombay High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S V Gangapurwala - Full Document

Smt. Kamal Kishori Chatursen ... vs M/S Rathi Udyog Ltd on 21 December, 2010

1982, RLR SC (N) 9 ;(f)Vinod Nagpal v. Bakshi S.K. Rai 1989 RLR 186; (g) Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar v. Mohamed Haji Latif and others AIR 1968 Supreme Court 1413; (h) Smt. Niranjan Kaur v. M/s New Delhi Hotels Ltd AIR 1988 Delhi 332; (i) Gangadhar Sahu and others v. Akhapati Ram Murty Patro and others AIR 1979 Orissa 66; (j) Basanta Priya and another v. Ramkrishna Das and other AIR 1960 Orissa 159; (k) Nagamalal Thevar v. Pandaram and another AIR 1977 Madras 347; (l) Paikanna Vithoba Mamidwar and another v. Laxminarayan Sukhdeo Dalya and another AIR 1979 Bombay 298; (m) Umang Puri v. Lt. Col.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1