citedby: 30887492

Md. Mofil @ Mahfil Miyah vs The State Of Bihar on 2 July, 2019

In view of law laid down by this Court in the case of Mahendra Prasad Singh vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2004(3) PLJR 491 and of Ram Vilas Singh vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2008(3) PLJR (HC) 253, it is evident that application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable in the said case. This Court has held that when the case is initially for non- bailable offences wherein the accused is taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the case cannot be held to be maintainable. The petitioner must honour the terms of the police bail and appear before the court without any delay. In case, the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40285 of 2019(2) dt.02-07-2019 3/3 appears before the Court below within six weeks then the court below shall consider his prayer for bail keeping in view the well established principle that a person, who is already on bail, shall not be denied such privilege unless there is any allegation of misuse, etc. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with the above directions.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Raja Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 17 July, 2019

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the law laid down by this Court, in the cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491 and Ram Vilas Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (3) PLJR 253, this application, for anticipatory bail, is not maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that since the case was initially for non-bailable offences wherein the petitioner was taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the same case cannot be held to be maintainable and petitioner must honour the terms of police bail and appear before the Court without any delay.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Jairam Mukhiya vs The State Of Bihar on 25 July, 2019

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19869 of 2019(4) dt.25-07-2019 2/2 taking into consideration the law laid down by this Court, in the cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491 and Ram Vilas Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (3) PLJR 253, this application, for anticipatory bail, is not maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that since the case was initially for non-bailable offences wherein the petitioner was taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the same case cannot be held to be maintainable and petitioner must honour the terms of police bail and appear before the Court without any delay.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Nitish Jamadar vs The State Of Bihar And Anr on 13 August, 2019

In view of submission made by the petitioner and the law laid down by this Court in case of Mahendra Prasad Singh vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2004(3)PLJR 491 and of; Ram Vilas Singh vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2008(3) PLJR 253, the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that when the case is initially for non-bailable offences wherein the accused is taken into custody and then is released on bail by the police, his application for anticipatory bail, on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the case, cannot be held to be maintainable. The petitioner must honour the terms of the police bail and appear before the court without any delay. As such in case, the petitioner appears before the court below within six weeks then the court below shall consider his prayer for bail keeping in view the well established principle that a person, who is already on bail, shall not be denied such privilege unless there is any allegation of misuse, etc.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Sanjit Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 6 September, 2019

No.52369 of 2019(3) dt.06-09-2019 2/2 cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491 and Ram Vilas Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (3) PLJR 253, this application, for anticipatory bail, is not maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that since the case was initially for non-bailable offences wherein the petitioner was taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the same case cannot be held to be maintainable and petitioner must honour the terms of police bail and appear before the Court without any delay.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Kumar Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 9 September, 2019

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56567 of 2019(2) dt.09-09-2019 2/2 and taking into consideration the law laid down by this Court, in the cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491 and Ram Vilas Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (3) PLJR 253, this application, for anticipatory bail, is not maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that since the case was initially for non-bailable offences wherein the petitioner was taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the same case cannot be held to be maintainable and petitioner must honour the terms of police bail and appear before the Court without any delay.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Rakesh Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 27 February, 2020

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the law laid down by this Court, in the cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491 and Ram Vilas Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (3) PLJR 253, this application, for anticipatory bail, is not maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that since the case was initially for non-bailable offences wherein the petitioner was taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the same case cannot be held to be maintainable and petitioner must Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86297 of 2019(2) dt.27-02-2020 3/3 honour the terms of police bail and appear before the Court without any delay.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Bijendra Paswan @ Vijendra Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 18 May, 2023

6. After having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the law laid down by this Court, in the cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491 and Ram Vilas Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (3) PLJR 253, this application, for anticipatory bail, is not maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that since the case was initially for non-bailable offences wherein the petitioner was taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the same case cannot be held to be maintainable and petitioner must honour the terms of police bail and appear before the Court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7969 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 3/3 without any delay.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Prashant Kumar Shrivastava @ Chintu @ ... vs The State Of Bihar on 12 July, 2023

6. After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the law laid down by this Court, in the cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491 and Ram Vilas Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (3) PLJR 253, this application, for anticipatory bail, is not Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26550 of 2023(2) dt.12-07-2023 3/3 maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that since the case was initially for non-bailable offences wherein the petitioner was taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the same case cannot be held to be maintainable and petitioner must honour the terms of police bail and appear before the Court without any delay.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Santosh Sah @ Santosh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2023

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the law laid down by this Court, in the cases of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491 and Ram Vilas Singh v. The State of Bihar, reported in 2008 (3) PLJR 253, this application, for anticipatory bail, is not maintainable inasmuch as this Court has held that since the case was initially for non-bailable offences wherein the petitioner was taken into custody and then released on bail by the police, an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that he has an apprehension of arrest in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55041 of 2023(2) dt.30-08-2023 3/3 same case cannot be held to be maintainable and petitioner must honour the terms of police bail and appear before the Court without any delay.

Patna High Court - Orders Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results