Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.70 seconds)
Documents citing Kana Ram And Etc. Etc. vs The Regional Transport Authority And ... on 17 January, 1989

Rai Sahib And Etc. Etc. vs State Of Haryana And Anr., Etc. Etc. on 24 January, 1995

9. No doubt it has been held in para 17 of Kana Ram's case, AIR 1990 Raj 143 (supra), that the inter-statal agreements of February, 1968 as well as of 1969 modified in 1981 are valid agreements unless they are modified or rescinded in accordance with law. But while deciding the question of validity of 1968 agreement, the point for rescission of the agreement of 1968 by six months' notice which expired on 12-8-88 was not taken into consideration and was expressly left open when it is said in para 16 "it may be stated that even if in case of valid agreement, and 1968 agreement has been held to be valid by us and we have refused to say anything about the alleged rescission of above agreement after six months' notice on December 8, 1988, as stated by Mr. Khan, counter-signatures were done only for periods of four months i.e. for less than three years or for duration of permits". It is manifest from the aforesaid that the Court has not considered the effect of the notice given by the State of Haryana while holding that the agreement of 1968 entered into between the State of Rajasthan and State of Haryana is a valid agreement. For the reasons stated in the aforesaid paragraph, I am of the view that the reciprocal transport agreement concluded between the States of Rajasthan and Haryana arrived at in the joint meeting held on 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th February, 1968, was legally rescinded by notice dated 7-6-88 of six months which expired on 12-8-88.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 9 - Cited by 9 - P P Naolekar - Full Document
1