Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 301 (3.81 seconds)
Documents citing Saurabh Chaudri & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 4 November, 2003

Mahua Bindal And Ors. vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ... on 30 July, 2020

In the present case, respondent No. 1 GGSIPU is following the dicta of the Supreme Court in the case of Saurabh Chaudri v. Union of India (supra) and Yatinkumar Jasubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat (supra) and various other cases which have approved Institutional Reservation up to 50% of the PG seats. In view of the stated legal position, this is clearly permissible. The pleas of the petitioners are clearly without merit.
Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - J Nath - Full Document

Kolluru V D K Kavya vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Peddi Reddy Harshavardhana Reddy vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manne Likhitha vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kumbhagiri Jahnavi vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kommoju Amrutha Varshini vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hitendra Kumar Choudhary vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kalluru Mutyala Naga Gopi Shankar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anmol Panda vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devarapalli Joseph vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

In Tanvi Behl (supra), while referring to its previous decisions in D.P.Joshi (supra) and Saurabh Chaudri (supra), it was held that domicile/residence based reservation is not the concept totally overthrown or jettisoned and that residence based reservation can be provided in the matter of admission to post graduate courses and same is permissible in law. The fourth issue is accordingly answered.
Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next