Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.47 seconds)
Documents citing W.S.Sethu Narayana Babu ( Deceased) vs S.Sathindar on 2 June, 2023

Ramesh Kumar vs Balbir Singh Yadav on 12 March, 2025

19 (6) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of ₹16,00,000/- (Rupees Sixteen lakhs only) from the defendant?... OPP 19.1 In view of the findings on issue nos. (1), (2) and (3), the plaintiff is not entitled to seek recovery on the basis of the cheque Ex P1 as Section 43 of the Negotiable Instruments Act bars the same. Reference may be made to the case of W.S. Sethu Narayana Babu and Ors. vs. S. Sathindar and Ors., MANU/TN/3052/2023, wherein it was held:
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lal Bahadur vs Nandan Singh on 1 May, 2025

The construction of a sixth floor is unauthorised, and as such, it cannot be lawfully sold or purchased. The agreement for the sale of an unauthorised construction is void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act as its consideration is illegal. 11.14 Once it is established that the consideration was illegal, Section 43 of the Negotiable Instruments Act would also come into play as per W.S. Sethu Narayana Babu (supra) and the cheque Ex PW1/E would create no obligation on the defendant to pay.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1