Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (2.07 seconds)
Documents citing Dr.Joy Anto vs C.R.Jaison on 10 March, 2021

Asif Faruk Kadawala vs The State By on 20 April, 2021

14. The learned counsel in support of his arguments, relied upon the order passed by the Kerala High Court in Crl.M.C.No.534/2016 in the case of Dr. Joy Anto v. C.R. Jaison and another decided on 10.03.2021, and brought to the notice of this Court paragraph No.18, wherein, it is observed that, if the pleadings filed in the court contain defamatory statements, it amounts to publication. Once a statement is filed in a Court of law, it can be considered as published. Hence, he cannot contend that the same is not published.
Karnataka High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - H P Sandesh - Full Document

Serum Institute Of India Pvt. Ltd. And ... vs Yohan Tengra And 6 Ors on 5 June, 2023

R 482 Waghmare 27/48 ::: Uploaded on - 05/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2023 08:55:07 ::: IAL.33254.22 in SL.33253.22 wt..doc 43 Mr. Ojha has relied upon judgments in Prabhakaran vs. Gangadharan13,; Joy Anto vs. C.R. Jaison & Ors.14, and Radhakrishnan Gurusamy & Ors. vs. M.R. Vinit Srivastava15 and Shivaji Rao Gaikwad vs. S. Mukunchand Bothra16, which have held that filing a pleadings in a Civil Court constitutes Publication under Section 500 of I.P.C. and is actionable under Sections 499/500 of I.P.C. This is in context of Mr. Ojha's submission that the Writ Petition pending in this Court namely Writ Petition filed by Dilip Lunawat, similar statements which are alleged in the present case to be per se defamatory had already been made/published and accordingly, the Defendants should not be restrained from making same/similar statements.
Bombay High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Ambar Koiri vs Yohan Tengra And 6 Ors on 5 June, 2023

R 482 Waghmare 27/48 ::: Uploaded on - 05/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2023 08:55:23 ::: IAL.33254.22 in SL.33253.22 wt..doc 43 Mr. Ojha has relied upon judgments in Prabhakaran vs. Gangadharan13,; Joy Anto vs. C.R. Jaison & Ors.14, and Radhakrishnan Gurusamy & Ors. vs. M.R. Vinit Srivastava15 and Shivaji Rao Gaikwad vs. S. Mukunchand Bothra16, which have held that filing a pleadings in a Civil Court constitutes Publication under Section 500 of I.P.C. and is actionable under Sections 499/500 of I.P.C. This is in context of Mr. Ojha's submission that the Writ Petition pending in this Court namely Writ Petition filed by Dilip Lunawat, similar statements which are alleged in the present case to be per se defamatory had already been made/published and accordingly, the Defendants should not be restrained from making same/similar statements.
Bombay High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Ambar Koiri vs Serum Institute Of India Pvt. Ltd. And 7 ... on 5 June, 2023

R 482 Waghmare 27/48 ::: Uploaded on - 05/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2023 08:55:13 ::: IAL.33254.22 in SL.33253.22 wt..doc 43 Mr. Ojha has relied upon judgments in Prabhakaran vs. Gangadharan13,; Joy Anto vs. C.R. Jaison & Ors.14, and Radhakrishnan Gurusamy & Ors. vs. M.R. Vinit Srivastava15 and Shivaji Rao Gaikwad vs. S. Mukunchand Bothra16, which have held that filing a pleadings in a Civil Court constitutes Publication under Section 500 of I.P.C. and is actionable under Sections 499/500 of I.P.C. This is in context of Mr. Ojha's submission that the Writ Petition pending in this Court namely Writ Petition filed by Dilip Lunawat, similar statements which are alleged in the present case to be per se defamatory had already been made/published and accordingly, the Defendants should not be restrained from making same/similar statements.
Bombay High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Ambar Koiri vs Serum Institute Of India Pvt. Ltd. And 7 ... on 5 June, 2023

R 482 Waghmare 27/48 ::: Uploaded on - 05/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2023 08:55:18 ::: IAL.33254.22 in SL.33253.22 wt..doc 43 Mr. Ojha has relied upon judgments in Prabhakaran vs. Gangadharan13,; Joy Anto vs. C.R. Jaison & Ors.14, and Radhakrishnan Gurusamy & Ors. vs. M.R. Vinit Srivastava15 and Shivaji Rao Gaikwad vs. S. Mukunchand Bothra16, which have held that filing a pleadings in a Civil Court constitutes Publication under Section 500 of I.P.C. and is actionable under Sections 499/500 of I.P.C. This is in context of Mr. Ojha's submission that the Writ Petition pending in this Court namely Writ Petition filed by Dilip Lunawat, similar statements which are alleged in the present case to be per se defamatory had already been made/published and accordingly, the Defendants should not be restrained from making same/similar statements.
Bombay High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Smt. Geeta vs Prem Chand on 27 February, 2024

(emphasis supplied) Further reliance may also be placed on the various judgments such as 'Prabhakaran vs. Gangadharan (2006) SCC OnLine Ker 302,; Joy Anto vs. C.R. Jaison & Ors. Manupatra/KE/0632/2021 , and Radhakrishnan Gurusamy & Ors. vs. M.R. Vinit Srivastava Manu/TN/3491/2021 and Shivaji Rao Gaikwad vs. S. Mukunchand Bothra 2018 SCC OnLine Mad 3541, wherein it was held that filing a pleadings in a Court constitutes Publication.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1