citedby: 309933

1 - 4 of 4 (0.60 seconds)

Documents citing N. Selvakumaaran, M. Subramaniam And ... vs The Special Commissioner, Hindu ... on 29 April, 2003

B.Karthikeyan vs E.Nandhakumar on 9 October, 2020

8.In this regard, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners also relied upon the judgment in Murugan Vs Subramania Swamy (cited supra), which reads as follows:-

Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - G K Ilanthiraiyan - Full Document

S. Savithri vs Lisa on 13 April, 2022

(2016) 2 MWN (Cri) 284 (Murugan Vs. Subramania Swamy), it is observed as follows:-

Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - G Chandrasekharan - Full Document

Periyasamy vs T.Rajan on 15 May, 2019

1.Murugan Vs Subramania Swamy, reported in 2016(2) Mwn (Cr) 284, wherein this Court has held as follows:

Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - B Pugalendhi - Full Document

Mrs.Kanagambal vs Kanniappan on 22 March, 2012

(See MURUGAN Vs. SUBRAMANIA GOUNDER [1997 (III) CTC 478]). The First Appellate Court must record his reasons as to why it disagree with the findings of the trial Court, otherwise the First Appellate Court cannot be said to have properly discharged its duty.

Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - P Devadass - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

B.Karthikeyan vs E.Nandhakumar on 9 October, 2020

S. Savithri vs Lisa on 13 April, 2022

Periyasamy vs T.Rajan on 15 May, 2019

Mrs.Kanagambal vs Kanniappan on 22 March, 2012