Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing Ultra Drytech Engineering Ltd. And Anr. vs Vaibhav Laxman Suravkar And Anr. on 22 June, 2004

Sanjay Shalikram Ingle vs M/S. Lokmat on 12 March, 2010

15. The aforesaid three judgments of the Supreme Court of India though considers the provisions of section 33-C(1) but as we have indicated above, the same are in pari materia with section 50 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 and therefore the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases will apply with equal force while construing the provision of section 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
Bombay High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Sanjay Shalikram Ingle vs M/S. Lokmat on 12 March, 2010

15. The aforesaid three judgments of the Supreme Court of India though considers the provisions of section 33-C(1) but as we have indicated above, the same are in pari materia with section 50 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 and therefore the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases will apply with equal force while construing the provision of section 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
Bombay High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Sanjay Shalikram Ingle vs M/S. Lokmat on 12 March, 2010

15. The aforesaid three judgments of the Supreme Court of India though considers the provisions of section 33-C(1) but as we have indicated above, the same are in pari materia with section 50 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 and therefore the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases will apply with equal force while construing the provision of section 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
Bombay High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Sanjay Shalikram Ingle vs M/S. Lokmat on 12 March, 2010

15. The aforesaid three judgments of the Supreme Court of India though considers the provisions of section 33-C(1) but as we have indicated above, the same are in pari materia with section 50 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 and therefore the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases will apply with equal force while construing the provision of section 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
Bombay High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Sanjay Shalikram Ingle vs M/S. Lokmat on 12 March, 2010

15. The aforesaid three judgments of the Supreme Court of India though considers the provisions of section 33-C(1) but as we have indicated above, the same are in pari materia with section 50 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 and therefore the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases will apply with equal force while construing the provision of section 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
Bombay High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Sanjay Shalikram Ingle vs M/S. Lokmat on 12 March, 2010

15. The aforesaid three judgments of the Supreme Court of India though considers the provisions of section 33-C(1) but as we have indicated above, the same are in pari materia with section 50 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 and therefore the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases will apply with equal force while construing the provision of section 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
Bombay High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Adarsh Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd vs Mrs.Anula Rajendra Nile on 26 March, 2014

"15. The aforesaid three judgments of the Supreme Court of India though considers the provisions of Section 33-C(1) but ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2014 22:27:03 ::: 13 Judgmnt WP 5917-1998.doc as we have indicated above, the same are in pari materia with Section 50 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 and therefore the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases will apply with equal force while construing the provision of Section 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - N M Jamdar - Full Document
1