Vijayraj Champalala Aggarwal vs Halonix Technologies Ptivate Limited on 20 October, 2016
8. Having heard the arguments of both the parties, I am of the view that main
arguments of ld. counsel for the revisionist are that cheques in question
have been shown issued by the company Halonix Ltd. whereas the case has
been filed by the respondent in the name of Halonix Technology Pvt. Ltd.
Both names are different. He also raised the contention that cheques in
question were issued as security. These plea of ld. counsel for the
revisionist has no weightage at this stage since in judgment "Sudarshan
Singh Dhariwal Vs. R.L.Kukreja, 2014 1 AD (CRI.) (DHC)22", wherein it
has been held that:-