citedby: 314268

16. Thus, the law, as it exists now, is what has been enunciated by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid judgment in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design & Handles Gmbh (supra).

Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

“17. As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well- established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error.

Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

“17. As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well- established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court 1(2004) 7 SCC 659 2(2019) 4 SCC 197 5/13 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.R.C.No.1484 of 2012 having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error.

Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

“17. As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well- established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error.

Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

1(2004) 7 SCC 659 2(2019) 4 SCC 197 5/13 http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.R.C.No.1486 of 2012 “17. As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well- established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error.

Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

“17.As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well-established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error. .... ” (emphasis supplied)

Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

“17.As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well-established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error.

Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

“17. As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well- established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error. .... ” (emphasis supplied)

Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

“17. As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well-established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error. .... ” (emphasis supplied)

Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - P N Prakash - Full Document

“17.As held by this Court in Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH [Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well-established principle of law that the Revisional Court will not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error.

Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page