Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing Thausif Ahammed Bengre vs State Of Kerala on 6 December, 2016

Shuhaib vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2025

Interpreting Section 60(3) of the Act, in Thausif Ahammed Bengre v. State of Kerala (2018 (1) KHC 598), this Court has succinctly held that a vehicle can be confiscated only if it is established by the prosecution that the vehicle was used for carrying the narcotic drug, psychotropic substance or controlled substance, that too without the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself or his agent.
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - C S Dias - Full Document

Najeeb vs State Of Kerala on 13 November, 2025

Interpreting Section 60(3) of the Act, in Thausif Ahammed Bengre v. State of Kerala (2018 (1) KHC 598), this Court has succinctly held that a vehicle can be confiscated only if it is established by the prosecution that the vehicle was used for carrying the narcotic drug, psychotropic substance or controlled substance, that too without the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself or his agent.
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - C S Dias - Full Document

Mridul. V vs State Of Kerala on 28 November, 2025

Interpreting Section 60(3) of the Act, in Thausif Ahammed Bengre v. State of Kerala (2018 (1) KHC 598), this Court has succinctly held that a vehicle can be confiscated only if it is established by the prosecution that the vehicle was used for carrying the narcotic drug, psychotropic substance or controlled substance, that too without the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself or his agent.
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - C S Dias - Full Document

Faheema Beegam. N vs State Of Kerala on 3 February, 2026

Interpreting Section 60(3) of the Act, in Thausif Ahammed Bengre v. State of Kerala (2018 (1) KHC 598), this Court has succinctly held that a vehicle can be confiscated only if it is established by the prosecution that the vehicle was used for carrying the narcotic drug, psychotropic substance or controlled substance, that too with the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself or his agent.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - C S Dias - Full Document

Sreelakshmi Vinod vs State Of Kerala on 17 March, 2026

Interpreting Section 60(3) of the Act, in Thausif Ahammed Bengre v. State of Kerala (2018 (1) KHC 598), this Court has succinctly held that a vehicle can be confiscated only if it is established by the prosecution that the vehicle was used for carrying the narcotic drug, CRL.MC NO. 2484 OF 2026 4 2026:KER:23573 psychotropic substance or controlled substance, that too with the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself or his agent.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - C S Dias - Full Document

Karthik vs State Of Kerala on 12 March, 2026

Interpreting Section 60(3) of the Act, in Thausif Ahammed Bengre v. State of Kerala (2018 (1) KHC 598), this Court has succinctly held that a vehicle can be confiscated only if it is established by the prosecution that the vehicle was used for carrying the narcotic drug, psychotropic substance or controlled CRL.MC NO.2234 of 2026 4 2026:KER:22175 substance, that too with the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself or his agent.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - C S Dias - Full Document
1   2 3 Next