citedby: 315565

Kalloo Singh And Others vs State Of U.P. on 1 May, 2026

26. The aforesaid judgment of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa (Supra) was followed by this Court also in Criminal Appeal No. 118 of 1997 (Ashiq Ali vs. State of U.P.) and the appellants convicted therein under Sections 147, 323/149, 325/149, 304-II/149, were given benefit of the Act, 1958 and the sentence of the appellant was reduced to the sentenced already undergone.

Allahabad High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - V K Singh - Full Document

Rakesh And Others vs State Of U.P. on 8 May, 2026

26. The aforesaid judgment of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa (Supra) was followed by this Court also in Criminal Appeal No. 118 of 1997 (Ashiq Ali vs. State of U.P.) and the appellants convicted therein under Sections 147, 323/149, 325/149, 304-II/149, were given benefit of the Act, 1958 and the sentence of the appellants was reduced to the sentenced already undergone.

Allahabad High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - V K Singh - Full Document

Sugriv Das And Others vs State on 8 May, 2026

26. The aforesaid judgment of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa (Supra) was followed by this Court also in Criminal Appeal No. 118 of 1997 (Ashiq Ali vs. State of U.P.) and the appellants convicted therein under Sections 147, 323/149, 325/149, 304-II/149, were given benefit of the Act, 1958 and the sentence of the appellant was reduced to the sentenced already undergone.

Allahabad High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - V K Singh - Full Document

Ram Nayan Verma vs State Of U.P. on 23 October, 2024

"8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa [(1999) 5 SCC 732] had considered the question as to whether the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act could be extended to an offence under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and concluded that there is no statutory bar for application of Probation of Offenders Act to an offence under Section 304 Part II, where the maximum punishment is neither death nor imprisonment for life.

Allahabad High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Nanhey vs State Of U.P. on 24 October, 2024

"8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa [(1999) 5 SCC 732] had considered the question as to whether the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act could be extended to an offence under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and concluded that there is no statutory bar for application of Probation of Offenders Act to an offence under Section 304 Part II, where the maximum punishment is neither death nor imprisonment for life.

Allahabad High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Shiv Shanker And 6 Others vs State Of U.P. on 25 October, 2024

"8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa [(1999) 5 SCC 732] had considered the question as to whether the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act could be extended to an offence under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and concluded that there is no statutory bar for application of Probation of Offenders Act to an offence under Section 304 Part II, where the maximum punishment is neither death nor imprisonment for life.

Allahabad High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Nandu And Nandkishore And Another vs State Of U.P. on 25 October, 2024

"8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa [(1999) 5 SCC 732] had considered the question as to whether the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act could be extended to an offence under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and concluded that there is no statutory bar for application of Probation of Offenders Act to an offence under Section 304 Part II, where the maximum punishment is neither death nor imprisonment for life.

Allahabad High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Shyam Lal And 2 Ors. vs State Of U.P. on 5 November, 2024

"8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa [(1999) 5 SCC 732] had considered the question as to whether the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act could be extended to an offence under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and concluded that there is no statutory bar for application of Probation of Offenders Act to an offence under Section 304 Part II, where the maximum punishment is neither death nor imprisonment for life.

Allahabad High Court Cites 65 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Bitu Pandey @ Ashish Kumar vs State Of U.P. on 25 October, 2024

"8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa [(1999) 5 SCC 732] had considered the question as to whether the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act could be extended to an offence under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and concluded that there is no statutory bar for application of Probation of Offenders Act to an offence under Section 304 Part II, where the maximum punishment is neither death nor imprisonment for life.

Allahabad High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Margoob Ahmed vs State Of U.P. on 5 November, 2024

"8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Muddappa [(1999) 5 SCC 732] had considered the question as to whether the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act could be extended to an offence under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and concluded that there is no statutory bar for application of Probation of Offenders Act to an offence under Section 304 Part II, where the maximum punishment is neither death nor imprisonment for life.

Allahabad High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results