Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Ramphal Verma vs Praphulla Kumar Behura 73 ... on 30 November, 2018

Ramphal Chaudhary vs Mahender on 17 May, 2023

13. In any case, since the defendant had not appeared despite service and also chose not to file WS, it can be safely presumed that he has no defence to offer. The suit of the plaintiff is well within the limitation as the same was filed on 23.05.2022. The plaintiff has availed the benefit of directions given in case of "In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) NO. 3 OF 2020, Miscellaneous Application No. 665 OF 2021 and Miscellaneous Application No. 21 OF 2022), wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that "II. In cases where the limitation would have expired during the period between 15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022, notwithstanding the actual balance period of limitation remaining, all persons shall have ASHISH Digitally by ASHISH signed KUMAR MEENA Civil Suit No. 671/22 Ramphal vs. Chaudhary Vs.Mahender KUMAR Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P C Sebastian vs Director General Of Posts on 10 January, 2023

(Dated, this the 10th January, 2023) JUSTICE K. HARIPAL JUDICIAL MEMBER ax/ds 17 O.A No. 180/00742/2018 Applicant's Annexures Annexure A1. True copy of the PPO NO.5972/LPS/TVM Annexure A2. True copy of the fitment table annexed to CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 Annexure A3. True copy of the revised PPO issued on 1.3.2013 Annexure A4. True copy of the revised PPO issued on 21.1.2014 Annexure A5. True copy of the order dt. 16.8.2013 in OA. No.715/2012 Annexure A6. True copy of the Order in RP(C)No.2565/2015 in SLP(C)No.6567/2015 dt:28.8.2015 Annexure A7. True copy of the representation dt: 12.2.2017 Annexure A8. True copy of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Ramphal Vs. Union of India WP(C)No.3035/2016 dt:3.8.2016 Annexure A9.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1