Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.21 seconds)
Documents citing M. Govinda Gounder vs Pichandi Pillai And Parasurama Gounder on 6 September, 2002

V.P.S.Viswanathan vs Sri Raja Yarns Traders on 26 October, 2009

11. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would draw attention of this Court to a decision of this Court reported in 2002 4 CTC 550 (M.Govinda Gounder v. Pichandi Pillai and another) in which, it is observed that ultimately the burden to prove the allegation of fraud is very heavy on the person pleading fraud and in case if the plaintiff has not made any attempt to adduce any evidence, it has to be decided that the defence of the plaintiff ought to have been rejected.
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - S Palanivelu - Full Document

K.P.Devanath vs Chandika V.Nayak on 25 January, 2022

7. Learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance on the Judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court reported in 2000 (2) CTC 524 (Mad) Sri Krishna Chit Funds Vs. R.S.Pillai and Another, wherein it is stated that the order of attachment should be registered before the concerned SRO with proper details, otherwise subsequent purchasers cannot be affected and the same principle has been followed in the case reported in 2002 (4) CTC 550 [Govinda Gounder Vs. Pichandi Pillai & Another]. Further, the learned counsel for the appellant contends that appellant had purchased the property for a valuable consideration of Rs.28 Lakhs in the year 2006 itself, whereas the order of attachment was for the claim of Rs.1,33,000/- based on a pronote, thereby pleaded to allow the present appeal.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1