Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing A.P. Dalit Mahasabha vs Govt. Of A.P. And Ors. on 4 March, 1999

Ramesh Ramdhanji Pachori & Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 12 March, 2015

It is also pointed out to us that said judgment has been followed by this Court while considering the challenge on the ground of absence of the advertisement in its judgment in the case of Ramdas Shriniwas Nayak and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors. (supra) and by Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of A. P. Dalit Mahasabha Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors. (supra).
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - B P Dharmadhikari - Full Document

B. Ramalakshma Reddy And Others vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 18 August, 1999

18. A large latitude would have to be allowed to the executive to decide for itself as to what would be the reasonable decision and the economic soundness of the proposed development plan undertaken by the State. It cannot be a subject matter of debate in a judicial review proceedings as long as such plan is not contra constitutional. The Courts will be reluctant and perhaps ill equipped to investigate into merits of such complex formulations. In deciding the policies the executive is entitled to take legitimate political and economic considerations into account. The executive is fully entitled while making such decision to take into account such consideration, such as promotion of regional stability, good Government, and its commercial interest. A particular decision taken by the executive may be right or wrong. The wisdom behind such decision cannot be judicially reviewed. (See: Andhra Pradesh Dalit Mahasabha v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, ).
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - B S Reddy - Full Document

Md. Kismat Ali & Ors vs The Chairman on 20 May, 2011

19. When a State action is challenged, the function of the court is to examine the action in accordance with law and to determine whether the legislature or the executive has acted within the powers and functions assigned under the Constitution and if not, the court must strike down the action. While doing so the court must remain within its self-imposed limits. The court sits in judgment on the action of a coordinate branch of the Government. While exercising power of judicial review of administrative action, the court is not an Appellate Authority. The Constitution does not permit the court to direct or advise the executive in matters of policy or to sermonize qua any matter which under the Constitution lies within the sphere of legislature or executive, provided these authorities do not transgress their constitutional limits or statutory powers." Similar view was expressed by the Division Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court in case of A. P Dalit Mahasabha vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. reported in AIR 1999 AP 208in following words :
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - H Tandon - Full Document

Saraswati Mondal (Sarkar) & Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 30 June, 2011

19. When a State action is challenged, the function of the court is to examine the action in accordance with law and to determine whether the legislature or the executive has acted within the powers and functions assigned under the Constitution and if not, the court must strike down the action. While doing so the court must remain within its self-imposed limits. The court sits in judgment on the action of a coordinate branch of the Government. While exercising power of judicial review of administrative action, the court is not an Appellate Authority. The Constitution does not permit the court to direct or advise the executive in matters of policy or to sermonize qua any matter which under the Constitution lies within the sphere of legislature or executive, provided these authorities do not transgress their constitutional limits or statutory powers." Similar view was expressed by the Division Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court in case of A. P Dalit Mahasabha vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. reported in AIR 1999 AP 208in following words :
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 5 - Cited by 5 - H Tandon - Full Document
1