Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.63 seconds)
Documents citing Dr.Mrs.Seema Ajay Bhoosreddy vs The State Of Maharashtra on 4 August, 2011

Poonam Agarwal vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 3 May, 2019

In case of Dr.Seema Ajay Bhoosreddy Vs. State of Maharashtra,5 it was held that in order to bring out the offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC, specific abetment as contemplated by Section 107 of the IPC on the part of the accused with an intention to bring about the suicide of the person concerned as a result of the abetment is required. The intention of the accused to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide is a must for the particular offence under Section 306 of the IPC. The following observations of the Division Bench needs a reproduction :
Bombay High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - B Dangre - Full Document

Smt. Jayashree Wd/O. Sunil Kotgirwar vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ... on 20 March, 2017

07] This Court in similar set of facts in the case of Seema Ajay Bhoosreddy vs. State of Maharashtra - [2012(2) Bom.C.R.(Cri.)502] observed that deceased student was hypersensitive, unable to face ground realities of life to ordinary petulance which happen in day to day life. Petitioner therein was a Professor in a Dental College and a student of BDS Course had committed suicide. It was alleged in F.I.R. that petitioner and other Doctors targeted the deceased and asked her to complete difficult course within a short time and had threatened her and so she committed suicide. A suicide note was also found during ::: Uploaded on - 24/03/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 25/03/2017 00:37:52 ::: apl.93.17.jud 21 investigation in the said case. In this background, the learned Single Judge (B.R. Gavai, J.) held that there is no material which can even be said to be prima facie sufficient to establish that applicants had done any act which can be said to be with an intention to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide.
Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 3 - B R Gavai - Full Document

Sau. Sujata W/O Vinod Musale vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 11 April, 2017

10] This Court in similar set of facts in the case of Seema Ajay Bhoosreddy vs. State of Maharashtra - [2012(2) Bom.C.R.(Cri.)502] observed that deceased student was hypersensitive, unable to face ground realities of life to ordinary petulance which happen in day to day life. Petitioner therein was a Professor in a Dental College and a student of BDS Course had committed suicide. It was alleged in F.I.R. that petitioner and other Doctors targeted the deceased and asked her to complete difficult course within a short time and had threatened her and so she committed suicide. A suicide note was also found during investigation in the said case. In this background, the learned Single Judge (B.R. Gavai, J.) held that there is no ::: Uploaded on - 19/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 27/08/2017 22:54:28 ::: CRI. APPEAL NO.100.16.odt 17 material which can even be said to be prima facie sufficient to establish that applicants had done any act which can be said to be with an intention to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahadeo S/O Shaligram Hingankar And ... vs State Of ... on 12 April, 2017

08] This Court in similar set of facts in the case of Seema Ajay Bhoosreddy vs. State of Maharashtra - [2012(2) Bom.C.R.(Cri.)502] observed that deceased student was hypersensitive, unable to face ground realities of life to ordinary petulance which happen in day to day life. Petitioner therein was a Professor in a Dental College and a student of BDS Course had committed suicide. It was alleged in F.I.R. that petitioner and other Doctors targeted the deceased and asked her to complete difficult course within a short time and had threatened her and so she committed suicide. A suicide note was also found during investigation in the said case. In this background, the learned Single Judge held that there is no material which can even be said to be prima facie sufficient to establish that applicants had done any act which can be said to be with an intention to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide.
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sindhu Paul vs State Of Kerala on 13 November, 2017

16.In Seema Ajay Bhoosreddy vs. State of Maharashtra [2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1037], which decision was relied on by the learned Counsel, the Bombay High Court had occasion to deal with an identical issue. Petitioner therein was a Professor in a Dental College and a student of BDS Course had committed suicide. It was alleged in F.I.R. that petitioner and other Doctors targeted the deceased and asked her to complete a difficult course within a short time and had threatened her leading to her suicide. A suicide note was also found during investigation in the said case. The learned Single Judge after evaluating the materials went on to hold that there was no material to establish that applicants had done any act which can be said to be with an intention to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide.
Kerala High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 5 - V R Vijayaraghavan - Full Document
1   2 Next