Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 53 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing K.L.Francis vs The Kerala State Road Transport ... on 10 March, 2008

Unknown vs Present on 7 February, 2018

5. With reference to the reliance placed on the decision of the Larger Bench of this Court in Francis v. -:5:- O.P. (KAT) No.114 of 2018 Kerala State Road Transport Corporation [Supra], we find that the facts in the said case were entirely different. In the said case, the empanelled drivers of the KSRTC had sought for reckoning the period prior to their regularisation for the purpose of computing their pensionary benefits. In the said case, there was also a settlement, the clause of which had come up for interpretation. In the present case, the regularisation granted to the petitioners was only a one time measure, in the exercise of the discretion of the Government. Therefore, the petitioners cannot aspire for anything more than what has been granted by annexure A3 order of regularisation. In the above view of the matter, this Original Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S.Kumaresan vs State Of Kerala on 19 December, 2025

In support of his argument regarding entitlement to reckon his entire service in KSLUB on contract basis from 01.04.1998 till 25.08.2005, the learned Counsel relied on 7 OP(KAT)No.209 of 2020 2025:KER:97952 the judgments of the Apex Court as well as this Court, such as Laila T.M v. State of Kerala [2014 (3) KLT 754], Francis K.L v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Tvm [2015 (2) KHC 1], Netram Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh [2018 (5) SCC 430], Uday Pratap Thakur v. State of Bihar [ AIR 2023 SC 2971], Vinod Kumar v. Union of India [2024 (9) SCC 327] and Girija C v. State of Kerala [2025 KHC Online 10459].
Kerala High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Prasanna Kumar V vs State Of Kerala on 7 February, 2012

The issue is covered by the common judgment dated 20.02.2015 by the Larger Bench of this Court in K.L. Francis v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation and Others [2015 (1) KLT 1051 (LB)]. Therefore the provisional services put in by the petitioners prior to their regular appointment on the advice of the Kerala Public Service Commission is liable to be reckoned for pension. It is declared that the said dictum covers the case of the petitioners also to whom the benefits of the Larger Bench decision of this Court shall be extended.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Chitambaresh - Full Document

P.K.Sivadas vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 22 December, 2011

The issue is covered by the common judgment dated 20.02.2015 by the Larger Bench of this Court in K.L. Francis v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation and Others [2015 (1) KLT 1051 (LB)]. Therefore the provisional services put in by the petitioners prior to their regular appointment on the advice of the Kerala Public Service Commission is liable to be reckoned for pension. It is declared that the said dictum covers the case of the petitioners also to whom the benefits of the Larger Bench decision of this Court shall be extended.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Chitambaresh - Full Document

R.Sureshkumar vs State Of Kerala on 8 February, 2012

2. The prime contention put forth by the petitioners is that, the issue with respect to counting of provisional service is covered by Exts.P34 and P36 judgments rendered by this Court. So also it is contended that, the issue is also covered by the Larger Bench judgment of this Court in Francis v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Thiruvananthapuram and another [2015(1) KLT 1051(LB)]. It is in this background this writ petition is filed.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Salimkumar K S vs The Kerala State Road Transport ... on 3 February, 2026

4. This Court in K.L. Francis v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation [2015 (1) KLT 1051 LB] held that the employees of KSRTC are entitled for reckoning their prior service for pension and other benefits, as mentioned in Clause XXXIII in the Pay Revision Agreement dated 13.04.1999. The KSRTC approached the Hon'ble Apex Court 2026:KER:9086 WP(C) No.41865 of 2025 5 against these judgments through Civil Appeal Nos.3161- 3165/2019.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - N Nagaresh - Full Document

B. Gopichandran Nair vs Kerala State Road Transport ... on 13 January, 2020

4. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar and t aking note of the submission of the learned Standing counsel for the respondents, I W.P(C).No.632 of 2020 3 dispose the Writ Petition with a direction to the respondents to reckon the provisional service of the petitioner along with his regular service for the purposes of computation of his pensionary benefits in accordance with the decision of this Court in K.L.Francis's case (supra). It is made clear that the grant of the benefits to the petitioner shall be subject to the outcome of the special leave petition preferred by the respondents before the Supreme Court.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document

N.Haridas vs Director Of Urban Affairs on 17 August, 2020

Writ petition has been filed praying that the respondents may be directed to count the temporary service rendered by the petitioners as substitute workers/contingency worker for the purpose of computation of pension. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered in favour of the petitioners by the judgment of a Larger Bench in K.L.Francis and Another V. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation and Another (2015 (1) KLT 1051) and that the petitioners will be satisfied, with a direction to the respondents to consider Ext.P2 representation in the light of the above said judgment.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T R Ravi - Full Document

The Secretary To Government vs Poly C.T on 20 October, 2021

3. Both sides will address this Court as to the applicability or otherwise of the dictum laid down by the Apex Court in the recent decision in the case in V. Sukumaran v. State of Kerala and another [(2020) 8 SCC 106] and that of the Larger Bench of this Court in the case in Francis v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation [2015 (1) KLT 1051(L.B.)] to the facts of this case.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Thomas - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next