citedby: 3186335

Mandalapu Rajesh vs The Branch Manager on 11 April, 2022

In Ahmed Nawab Alladin v. Hyderabad Industries Ltd., Hyderabad6, it was held that "Courts would prefer to adjudicate the suits on merits, than to discard them at the threshold and rejection of plaint is almost a rarity". In ascertaining whether the petition shows a cause of action, the Court does not enter upon a trial of the issues affecting the merits of the claim made by a petitioner. It cannot take into consideration, the defences which the defendant may raise upon the merits nor is the Court competent to make an elaborate enquiry into doubtful or complicated questions of law or fact. If the allegations in the petition, prima facie, show a cause of action, the Court cannot embark upon an enquiry as to whether 5 6 2015(3) ALD 584 5 the allegations are true in fact, or whether the petitioner will succeed in the claims made by him.

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Jayasurya - Full Document

Unknown vs Syeda on 18 April, 2022

In Ahmed Nawab Alladin vs. Hyderabad Industries Limited4, it was held that the Courts would prefer rather than rejecting the plaint, which is almost a rarity, to adjudicate the suits on merits, than to discard them at the threshold and the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been taking consistently the view that only contents as a whole that need to be taken into account for determining existence of cause of action and jurisdiction.

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - N Jayasurya - Full Document

Unknown vs Honourable Sri Justice Ninala ... on 2 May, 2022

In Ahmed Nawab Alladin v. Hyderabad Industries Limited7, it was held that the Courts would prefer rather than rejecting the plaint, which is almost a rarity, to adjudicate the suits on merits, than to discard them at the threshold and the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been taking consistently the view that only contents as a whole that need to be taken into account for determining existence of cause of action and jurisdiction.

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Jayasurya - Full Document

Chilamakuri Suresh Babu vs Owk.Sreenivasulu on 5 July, 2022

In Ahmed Nawab Alladin v. Hyderabad Industries Limited6, it was held that the Courts would prefer rather than rejecting the plaint, which is almost a rarity, to adjudicate the suits on merits, than to discard them at the threshold and the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been taking consistently the view that only contents as a whole that need to be taken into account for determining existence of cause of action and jurisdiction.

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - N Jayasurya - Full Document

N.Shabana Khan vs B.Shafi Sab on 11 April, 2022

In Ahmed Nawab Alladin v. Hyderabad Industries Limited2, it was held that the Courts would prefer rather than rejecting the plaint, which is almost a rarity, to adjudicate the suits on merits, than to discard them at the threshold and the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been taking consistently the view that only contents as a whole that need to be taken into account for determining existence of cause of action and jurisdiction.

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - N Jayasurya - Full Document

Vijaya Lakshmi Nelluri, vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 27 April, 2022

16. Further in Ahmed Nawab Alladin v. Hyderabad Industries Limited10, it was held that the Courts would prefer rather than rejecting the plaint, which is almost a rarity, to adjudicate the suits on merits, than to discard them at the threshold and the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has been taking consistently the view that only contents as a whole that need to be taken into account for determining existence of cause of action and jurisdiction.