Sc No: 599/17 State vs . Sanjay Kumar on 21 July, 2022
17. It has been held in para 8 of the judgment titled
as Bunty Vs. State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 85 (2.01 seconds)Documents citing
Bunty vs State (G.N.C.T.) Of Delhi on 16 March, 2011
State vs Arvind Maurya on 19 October, 2022
In the present facts, it is apt to refer to para 8 of judgment titled
as Bunty vs. State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no. 846/2009 decided
on 16.03.2011 by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court wherein it is held that :
State vs . Parhlad on 31 July, 2014
31. As far as the allegations of kidnapping are concerned, it has been held in
para 8 of judgment titled as Bunty vs. State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no.
846/2009 decided on 16.03.2011 by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that :
"8. In this case, the prosecutrix had accompanied the
Appellant voluntarily without any use of force exercised by
him. It is not a case wherein he had taken the prosecutrix
after enticing her. Prosecutrix had travelled with the accused
to different places outside Delhi without raising any alarm or
complaining to fellow passengers that she had been taken
away by force. If a minor accompanies accused voluntarily
without any offer or allurement then offence under Section
363 is not made out. ...."
State vs . Chiranji Lal on 30 August, 2014
16. As far as the allegations of kidnapping are concerned, it has been held in
para 8 of judgment titled as Bunty vs. State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no.
846/2009 decided on 16.03.2011 by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that :
"8. In this case, the prosecutrix had accompanied the
Appellant voluntarily without any use of force exercised by
him. It is not a case wherein he had taken the prosecutrix
after enticing her. Prosecutrix had travelled with the accused
to different places outside Delhi without raising any alarm or
complaining to fellow passengers that she had been taken
away by force. If a minor accompanies accused voluntarily
without any offer or allurement then offence under Section
363 is not made out. ...."
State vs . Sunil Kumar @ Loha on 23 March, 2013
34 It has been held in para 8 of judgment titled as Bunty vs. State (G.N.C.T.)
of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no. 846/2009 decided on 16.03.2011 by the Hon'ble Delhi High
Court that :
"8. In this case, the prosecutrix had accompanied the
Appellant voluntarily without any use of force exercised
by him. It is not a case wherein he had taken the
prosecutrix after enticing her. Prosecutrix had travelled
with the accused to different places outside Delhi without
raising any alarm or complaining to fellow passengers
that she had been taken away by force. If a minor
accompanies accused voluntarily without any offer or
allurement then offence under Section 363 is not made
out. ...."
Sc No: 228/13 State vs . Md Zakir on 1 April, 2015
17. It has been held in para 8 of the judgment titled as
Bunty Vs. State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no. 846/2009
decided on 16.03.2011 by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that :
State vs . Ramesh @ Ravi & Anr. on 17 January, 2015
In similar
circumstances, In para 8 of judgment titled as Bunty vs. State (G.N.C.T.)
of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no. 846/2009 decided on 16.03.2011, it was held
by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that :
"8. In this case, the prosecutrix had accompanied
the Appellant voluntarily without any use of force
exercised by him. It is not a case wherein he had
taken the prosecutrix after enticing her. Prosecutrix
had travelled with the accused to different places
outside Delhi without raising any alarm or
complaining to fellow passengers that she had been
taken away by force. If a minor accompanies
accused voluntarily without any offer or allurement
then offence under Section 363 is not made out. ...."
State vs . Manoj @ Krishna on 8 January, 2015
In
S.C. No.142/14 : State vs. Manoj @ Krishna : Page 16 of 19
17
similar circumstances, In para 8 of judgment titled as Bunty vs. State
(G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no. 846/2009 decided on 16.03.2011,
it was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that :
"8. In this case, the prosecutrix had accompanied
the Appellant voluntarily without any use of force
exercised by him. It is not a case wherein he had
taken the prosecutrix after enticing her. Prosecutrix
had travelled with the accused to different places
outside Delhi without raising any alarm or
complaining to fellow passengers that she had been
taken away by force. If a minor accompanies
accused voluntarily without any offer or allurement
then offence under Section 363 is not made out. ...."
Sc No: 156/14 State vs . Amir on 7 July, 2015
13. It has been held in para 8 of the judgment titled as
Bunty Vs. State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no.
846/2009 decided on 16.03.2011 by the Hon'ble Delhi High
Court that :
State vs . Wasim Ansari on 25 February, 2015
In this regard, it is relevant to refer to judgment in case of Bunty vs. State
(G.N.C.T.) of Delhi in Crl. Appeal no. 846/2009 decided on 16.03.2011, wherein
it has been held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that :
"8. In this case, the prosecutrix had accompanied the
Appellant voluntarily without any use of force exercised by
him. It is not a case wherein he had taken the prosecutrix
after enticing her. Prosecutrix had travelled with the
accused to different places outside Delhi without raising any
alarm or complaining to fellow passengers that she had
been taken away by force. If a minor accompanies accused
voluntarily without any offer or allurement then offence
under Section 363 is not made out. ...."