Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.87 seconds)

Smt. Lali Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 2 February, 2023

In this regard, the judgments of the Uday Chand (supra), Arikala Narasa Reddy (supra) & Amit Narain Rai (supra) over which reliance have been placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner all indicate that a direction for re-counting of votes can be done and the Court would be justified in ordering a re-count of the ballot papers where the Court trying the petition is prima facie satisfied that the making of such an order is imperatively necessary to decide the dispute and to do complete and effectual justice between the parties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - A Moin - Full Document

Raheema vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief ... on 2 June, 2022

(12) Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgement rendered by this Court in Amit Narain Rai Vs. State of U.P. and others [ (2012) 2 UPLBEC 1582] wherein this Court after considering the judgements rendered by the Supreme Court under Representation of People Acts has also considered the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act and Section 12-C thereof and Rule of 1994 Act and observed that:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

Yogendra Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. ... on 14 June, 2022

Replying to the aforesaid preliminary objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the remedy under Section 12-C (6) can be availed only against a final order deciding the Election Petition and it does not lie against an order for recounting of ballot papers. He has placed reliance on the judgements of this Court in Mohd. Mustafa Vs. U.P.-Ziladhikari, Phoolpur Azamgarh and others [(20070 3 UPLBEC 2636], Amit Narain Rai Vs. State of U.P. and others [ (2012) 2 UPLBEC 1582] and Nirdosh Tyagi Vs. State of U.P. and others [ 2017 (136) RD 136].
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Udaibhan Singh vs Anil And 15 Others on 10 September, 2013

The decision cited by the learned counsel for the petitioner in case of Virendra Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2008 (105) RD 480 and in the case of Amit Narain Rai Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2012 (116) RD 711 does not help the petitioner, inasmuch as the said decisions revolves on the facts of its own case. Needless to state here the position of law has been crystallized by the Supreme Court in a catena of decisions.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - T Agarwala - Full Document
1