Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (1.23 seconds)
Documents citing Umed Singh vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 6 May, 2021

Rajiv Bal vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 6 November, 2025

e. Though not arising from the above, however, many such cases are being regularly filed under the provisions of EPH Act, 1948 in similar circumstances, whether the judgement of the Supreme Court in Mohinder Singh laying down the law that post notification u/s 507(a) of DMC Act 1957, the provisions of DLR Act, 1954 cease to apply and the proceedings pending thereunder would be non est in law would also apply in a similar fashion to proceedings pending under EPH Act, 1948 since definition of the word "land" appears to have commonality between the two enactments? if so, to what effect?(regard may be had to the judgement dated 01.11.1997 passed the learned division bench of this Court in C.W. No. 2253 of 1997 captioned as Umed Singh vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors. reported in (1997) 69 DLT 957 (DB)."
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nem Chand Jain vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 7 November, 2025

e. Though not arising from the above, however, many such cases are being regularly filed under the provisions of EPH Act, 1948 in similar circumstances, whether the judgement of the Supreme Court in Mohinder Singh laying down the law that post notification u/s 507(a) of DMC Act 1957, the provisions of DLR Act, 1954 cease to apply and the proceedings pending thereunder would be non est in law would also apply in a similar fashion to proceedings pending under EPH Act, 1948 since definition of the word "land" appears to have commonality between the two enactments? if so, to what effect?(regard may be had to the judgement dated 01.11.1997 passed the learned division bench of this Court in C.W. No. 2253 of 1997 captioned as Umed Singh vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors. reported in (1997) 69 DLT 957 (DB)."
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balbir Singh & Ors vs Consolidation Officer & Ors on 22 September, 2023

In support of his submission, counsel cites Umed Singh vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.1 "14. No other provision of the Delhi Land Reforms Act or any other provision of any other enactment was brought to our notice due to which the revenue estate on being declared to be urbanized might affect the status of the land located therein. Accordingly, the lands situated in Village Bamnolli, irrespective of issuance of the notification under section 507 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 would continue to remain agricultural land and will not affect its status. Consequently, it cannot have any effect on the on going process of consolidation, which is being carried out under a valid piece of legislation, namely, Consolidation Act, the object of which is to provide for better cultivation of land within the estate concerned."
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A J Bhambani - Full Document

Court On Its Own Motion vs Nemo on 24 January, 2025

d. A Judicial clarity be rendered as to what would be the remedy available to various stakeholders who are as on the date of notification under section 507(a) DMC Act, 1957, at different stages of proceedings contemplated under the DLR Act, 1954? e. Though not arising from the above, however, many such cases are being regularly filed under the provisions of EPH Act, 1948 in similar circumstances, whether the judgement of the Supreme Court in Mohinder Singh laying down the law that post notification u/s 507(a) of DMC Act 1957, the provisions of DLR Act, 1954 cease to apply and the proceedings pending thereunder would be non est in law would also apply in a similar fashion to proceedings pending under EPH Act, 1948 since definition of the word "land" appears to have commonality between the two enactments? if so, to what effect?(regard may be had to the judgement dated 01.11.1997 passed the learned division bench of this Court in C.W. No. 2253 of 1997 captioned as Umed Singh vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors. reported in (1997) 69 DLT 957 (DB)."
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document

Hoshiar Singh Now Deceased Through Lrs & ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 3 December, 2025

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 20:48:55 of the word "land" appears to have commonality between the two enactments? if so, to what effect?(regard may be had to the judgement dated 01.11.1997 passed the learned division bench of this Court in C.W. No. 2253 of 1997 captioned as Umed Singh vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors. reported in (1997) 69 DLT 957 (DB)."
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Vikas Kumar & Ors vs Union Of India Through Secretary & Ors on 10 December, 2025

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2025 at 21:03:55 between the two enactments? if so, to what effect?(regard may be had to the judgement dated 01.11.1997 passed the learned division bench of this Court in C.W. No. 2253 of 1997 captioned as Umed Singh vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors. reported in (1997) 69 DLT 957 (DB)."
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next