Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)

Sukhendu Bikash Addy vs Bipin Behari Addy And Ors. on 23 July, 2001

Same view was taken in Chiranjilal v. Hardwarilal, ILR (1964) 2 Punj 321; and Baldeo Das v. Kishanlal . Once the sale is directed under Section 2 and no application under Section 3 is made then the sale is to be effected according to Section 6. There is nothing to show that Section 6 was not complied with when the present order was passed. On the other hand it shows there was a reserve price. The procedure for sale is provided in Section 7. It is not alleged that there was any infraction of Section 7.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - D K Seth - Full Document
1