Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Bhawsar Home Furnishers And Decorators vs Dattaram Pandurang Mistri And Ors. on 25 September, 1987

K. Ramaseshu vs Hon'Ble Labour Court, Rep. By Its ... on 21 March, 2006

12. Reliance is placed upon the judgment of the Bombay High Court in Bhawsar Home Furnishers and Decorators v. Dattaram Pundurang Mistri and Ors. 1993 (III) LLJ 702 (Bombay) Not good law In view of 1995 (I) LLJ 395 (SC). A learned single judge of the Bombay High Court held that the legality and validity to the retrenchment can be examined in an application under Section 33-C (2) of the Act. The relevant portion of the judgment reads as under:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - L N Reddy - Full Document

Jagannath Bhagwandas Shrivastav And ... vs Harish Thadani And Anr. on 12 February, 1993

4. Aggrieved by the action of the Labour Court, the petitioners have approached this Court by filing this petition. According to the counsel for the petitioners, Labour Court was not justified in dismissing the applications without making an enquiry into the claim of the petitioners that they were the employees of the respondent No. 1. Reliance is placed in this connection on the decisions of this Court in Furnishers and Decorators, Bombay v. D. P. Mistri, 1988 (1) LLN 495 and Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. Aditya N. S. Oupadhyay & Ors. 1993 I LLJ 839 and the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Desai Brothers Ltd. v. Smt. Laxmibai Peddmolla, 1988 (2) LLN. 186. The counsel for the petitioners also placed reliance on a post-card in support of his contention that the petitioners were in employment of the respondent No. 1.
Bombay High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 34 - Full Document
1