Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 503 (4.00 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P vs Kishan Chand & Ors on 20 August, 2004

(1) A Breach Of Protection Order vs State Of Haryana" Reported As Cc on 9 May, 2018

Accused Kishan Chand stated that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case by the complainant. He further stated that 12 years had been passed since his marriage but the complainant had stayed with him only for 02-03 months, since she could not adjust in the matrimonial house. Further, he stated that she was of quarrelsome nature and did not want to live with him. He also stated that the complainant had filed the present complaint in order to extort State v. Kishan Chand FIR No. 193/13 PS: Subzi Mandi Page 5 of 14 money from him and to cause harassment to him and his family members. The other accused persons, namely, Santosh, Sheetal and Nand Kishore stated that they were residing separately in a separate floor and did not torture, harass or give beatings to the complainant on account of demand of dowry at any point of time. Further, the accused Pushpa stated that she never tortured, harassed and beaten the complainant on account of dowry at any point of time, since she was living in her matrimonial house prior to the marriage of the complainant with the accused Kishan Chand.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next