Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.57 seconds)Shiv Kumar vs . Surender Sharma & Ors. on 21 October, 2021
Page no.12 of total 13
MACP No.657/17
Shiv Kumar Vs. Surender Sharma & Ors.
Shiv Kumar vs . Durgesh on 13 November, 2018
On the other hand, it was argued by Ld. Defence
counsel that accused was not having any liability towards the complainant
herein as she had transacted with one Mr. Sunny. Same defence was
disclosed by her in reply to legal notice dated 05.03.2016 (Ex.CW1/6). She
was not even knowing the complainant herein. It was further argued that
the signature on the cheque in question is not that of accused. Her cheque
CC No. 510038/16 5 /7 Shiv Kumar Vs. Durgesh
is alleged as having been misused by complainant. He has prayed for
acquittal of accused.
Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal vs Raj Bahadur Lal Jaiswal And 7 Others on 2 January, 2024
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of by requiring the Civil Judge (Jr.Div), Garvi seized with the 6-C application, filed in Original Suit No. 213 of 2022 (Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal versus Raj Bahadur Lal Jaiswal and others), to consider and pass appropriate orders on the same, expeditiously, preferably, on the next date fixed or within a period of three weeks from the next date fixed.
Krishna Kumar Jaysawal vs Atul Kumar Jaysawal And 3 Others on 10 August, 2022
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, learned Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C., Allahabad is directed to decide the Suit No.411 of 2019 (Atul Kumar Jaiswal Vs. Krishna Kumar Jaiswal and others), expeditiously in accordance with law after affording reasonable opportunities of hearing to the parties concerned, without granting undue adjournments to either of the parties, unless there is any legal impediment.
Smt. Somari vs Consolidated New Cases Bearing No. ... on 24 November, 2018
In order to establish his case, Sh. Raj Kumar Jaiswal
petitioner in the case titled as Raj Kumar Jaiswal Vs Sunil Kumar &
Ors. bearing MACT No. 56402/16 examined himself as PW1 and relied
Consolidated New Cases bearing No. 56461/16, 56346/16; 56401/16; 56402/16; 56482/16; 56735/16 & 57509/16 Page 11 / 48
upon the document viz. Copy of his voter identity card Ex.PW1/1.
Mr. Shiv Nandan Ahluwalia vs Sh. Deepak Kumar @ Bahaudur on 16 May, 2023
ASHISH Digitally signed
by ASHISH
Civil Suit No. 88/2021 KUMAR KUMAR MEENA
Sh. Shiv Nandan Ahiluwalia vs. Sh. Deepak Kumar @ Bahadur &ors. Date: 2023.05.16
MEENA 16:07:29 +05'30'
Ram Bahadur vs State Of U.P. And Another on 27 March, 2023
3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Ram Bahadur with the prayer to allow this application and quash the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 1054 of 2018 (Shiv Kumar Vs. Ram Bahadur), under Section 406, 504, 506(2) IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Basti, pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate-I, Basti including the summoning order dated 10.12.20118 and with a further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case, during the pendency of the present application.
Jyoti Jaiswal vs Manish Jaiswal on 14 July, 2023
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and
considering the pleadings in the case, we allow the transfer
petition. Accordingly, Matrimonial Case No. 01/2020, titled
“Manish Jaiswal v. Jyoti Jaiswal“, pending in the Court of the
Civil Judge Senior Division, Champua, District Keonjhar, Odisha is
directed to be transferred to the Principal Judge Family Court,
Kanpur Nagar, U.P.
Records of the case would be immediately transferred to the
transferee court.
Rajesh Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko ... on 10 August, 2023
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 23.07.2021, passed by the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki in Case No. 5093 of 2021 ? Shiv Kumari Vs. Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station - Kotwali, District - Barabanki whereby applicant has been summoned to face trial under Section138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Further prayer has been made to quash the entire proceedings of aforesaid case.