State Of Haryana And Others vs Dalel Singh on 27 January, 2012
5. The learned Single Judge has found that the petitioner-
respondent was neither recruited through the Employment Ex-
change nor he was directly appointed by the appointing authority
after obtaining non-availability certificate from the Employment Ex-
change. A categorically finding has been recorded by the learned
Single Judge that the petitioner-respondent has served the State of
Haryana for an uninterrupted period of 25 years 10 months as an
ad hoc employee. After placing reliance on para 7 of the judgment
rendered in the case of Bimal Kumar v. State of Haryana and anoth-
er, 1996(2) RSJ 290, learned Single Judge came to the conclusion
that even if the name of an employee has not been routed through
Employment Exchange, it cannot be construed a serious objection
in view of the fact that the employee had rendered service for such
a long duration.