Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.83 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Urmila Devi vs State Of U.P. & Another on 22 January, 2010

Diwakar Nath Tripathi vs State Of U.P. And Another on 7 July, 2025

Reliance has also been placed upon the Division Bench judgments of this Court in the case of Urmila Devi v. State of U.P. and Another, 2011 SCC OnLine All 1796, wherein it has been held inter-alia that Prathama and Madhyama (Visharad) (Examination) conducted by the Hindi Sahitya Sammelan are not equivalent to the High School and Intermediate Examination conducted by the Board of High School and Intermediation Education of U.P. 12.4- It next submitted that in the year 2012, in the column of highest educational qualification, while respondent no. 2 was contesting the Assembly Election from Sirathu Vidhan Sabha Constituency (Kaushambi), has disclosed that he has passed B.A. in the year 1997 from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad and similarly, false affidavit has been filed in the year 2014 Lok Sabha Election, Phoolpur Constituency and Vidhan Parishad election. It is further submitted that in the documents which have been made available to the revisionist under the Right to Information Act in respect of educational qualification of Shri Keshav Prasad Maurya from the Indian Oil as well as from the Election Commission, his writing and signatures were found different.
Allahabad High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - S K Singh - Full Document

Vinod Kumar Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 29 November, 2019

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents would contend that the petitioner in the writ petition has not disputed the fact that he has passed the Prathma and Madhyama examination from Hindi Sahitya Sammellan, Allahabad and this Court in the case of Urmila Devi Vs. State of U.P. and Another 2012 (1) UPLBEC 65 have held that the Prathma and Madhyama examination conducted by Hindi Sahitya Sammellan are not equivalent to High School and Intermediate Examination conducted by U.P. High School and Intermediate Board, Allahabad. Thus, the petitioner is not qualified and could not have been selected as Shiksha Mitra. Thus, even if there was no misrepresentation or concealment of fact on the part of petitioner, the petitioner cannot be allowed to continue as he lacks basic qualification for being selected as Shiksha Mitra.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Smt. Urmila Devi vs State Of Up And Another on 19 August, 2019

The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 02.01.2019, passed by the learned First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Etawah, in Criminal Revision No. 181 of 2017(Smt. Urmila Devi Vs. State of U.P. and another) and order dated 29.08.2017, passed by the CJM, Etawah, in Complaint Case NO. 2105 of 2016(Smt. Urmila Devi Vs. Japan Singh @ Jaipal Singh).
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Sinha - Full Document

Sri Bhagwat vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 6 December, 2019

The learned Single Judge has relied upon a judgment passed by the Apex Court in Rajasthan Pradesh Vs. Sardarshahar & Anr Vs. Union of India & Ors; 2010 (12) SCC 609 as well as the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Urmila Devi Vs. State of U.P. & Anr, 2012 (1) ADJ, 346, wherein it has been held that "Prathma" and "Madhyama" (Visharad) conducted by the Hindi Sahitya Sammelan are not equivalent to the High School and Intermediate Examination conducted by the Board of High School and Intermediate Education of U.P. and accordingly dismissed the writ petition vide order dated 01.4.2016.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhirgu Thakur vs The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief ... on 6 February, 2024

3. The appellant has pleaded that he acquired a qualification of Madhyama from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad and was eligible for appointment on compassionate ground. Ms. Varsha Ramsisaria, the learned State counsel refers to a decision of the Allahabad High Court in the "Urmila Devi v. State of UP and Another" 2011 0 Supreme (All) 2996 to submit that the degree granted by Hindi Sahitya Sammelan is not a valid degree for appointment to a Government post.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1