Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.53 seconds)

(O&M;) M/S Oberoi Timber Traders vs Narbir Singh Etc on 31 August, 2018

Harbir Singh in his cross-examination admitted that they had given a plot on rent to Jangjeet Enterprises (Gas Agency), which is one plot away from the premises in dispute, therefore, the landlords had not come to the Court with clean hands. His cross-examination further revealed that he had been running his office in the plot in which Jangjeet Enterprises was tenant but on the other hand, he alleged that he was doing a job and had no place to operate his business. Similarly, Narbir Singh admitted that he had been doing 8 of 22 ::: Downloaded on - 08-10-2018 00:31:02 ::: C.R. No.1258 of 2009 (O&M) -9- business since the year 1980, thus, the statements and affidavits given in the second rent petition i.e. M/s R.K. Traders vs. Narbir Singh and others were necessary and essential for proper adjudication of the lis and thus, preferred an application for additional evidence. Another application for additional evidence to place on record statement of Kamal Oberoi given in the Civil Suit No.317 of 23.10.1982 was filed before the Appellate Authority but the same was dismissed on the alleged reasoning that the contents of the application were silent, in other words, were neither here nor there.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - A Rawal - Full Document
1