Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.77 seconds)
Documents citing M/S.Neuberg Hitech Laboratories Pvt. ... vs Dr.Ganesan'S Hitech Diagnostic Centre ... on 28 July, 2022

Mr Sanjay Arora vs Jasmer on 24 April, 2024

(emphasis added) 16.4 Lastly, in the decision of Neuberg Hitech Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Dr. Ganesan's Hitech Diagnostic Centre Pvt. Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine Mad 8779, it was held that an injunction should follow if it appears, either prima facie or otherwise, that the adoption of the mark was dishonest. In the said decision, defendants were the the ex-employees of plaintiff and appropriated the mark of plaintiff by applying it to the business established by them. The relevant paragraph is extracted as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr Sanjay Arora vs Jasmer on 24 April, 2024

(emphasis added) 16.4 Lastly, in the decision of Neuberg Hitech Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Dr. Ganesan's Hitech Diagnostic Centre Pvt. Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine Mad Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(COMM) 614/2022 Page 21/25 By:MANISH KUMAR Signing Date:21.08.2024 17:11:01 8779, it was held that an injunction should follow if it appears, either prima facie or otherwise, that the adoption of the mark was dishonest. In the said decision, defendants were the the ex-employees of plaintiff and appropriated the mark of plaintiff by applying it to the business established by them. The relevant paragraph is extracted as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1