citedby: 340590

Cristina Minj vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 February, 2023

16. The upshot of the whole discussion is that the decision of the Single Bench as well as the Full Bench in Ram Sewak v. State of M.P.(supra) does not lay down the correct law, while the earlier Full Bench decision in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran v. State of M.P. (supra) lays down the correct law.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Sudhir Kumar Hundet vs Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut ... on 3 January, 2024

16. The upshot of the whole discussion is that the decision of the Single Bench as well as the Full Bench in Ram Sewak v. State of M.P.(supra) does not lay down the correct law, while the earlier Full Bench decision in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran v. State of M.P. (supra) lays down the correct law.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sarasamma R Pillai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 February, 2023

1 6 . The upshot of the whole discussion is that the decision of the Single Bench as well as the Full Bench in Ram Sewak v. State of M.P.(supra) does not lay down the correct law, while the earlier Full Bench decision in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran v. State of M.P. (supra) lays down the correct law.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Balwan Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Judgement ... on 13 November, 2013

In view of above proposition of law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another (supra) and the fact that the petitioner has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 452, 148, 323/149 and 302/149 which has paved way for dismissal from service; no interference is caused.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Lal Sahab Bairagi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 15 May, 2019

16. The upshot of the whole discussion is that the decision of the Single Bench as well as the Full Bench in Ram Sewak v. State of M.P.(supra) does not lay down the correct law, while the earlier Full Bench decision in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran v. State of M.P. (supra) lays down the correct law.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 20 - Full Document

Rameshchandra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 September, 2017

6 In view of the above subsequent development, by which the conviction of the petitioner has been stayed by this Court in Criminal Revision no. 936/2013 and in light of the liberty given by the Full Bench delivered in the case of Laxmi Narayan ( supra ), the impugned order dated 26/03/2016 is set aside and is remanded back to the respondent/s to reconsider the entire afresh and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of 60 days ( Sixty days ) from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mathura Singh Gharwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 July, 2015

In view of above proposition of law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another (supra) and the fact that the petitioner has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code which has paved way for dismissal from service; no interference is caused.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramraj Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 August, 2015

As to the contention whether an action is taken under Rule 10 (1) (i) whether a delinquent is entitled for an opportunity of hearing has been answered in negative by Full Bench of this Court in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran v. State of M.P. and another (supra):

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Shankarlal Pal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 September, 2014

In view of above proposition of law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (supra) and the fact that the petitioner having being convicted for an offence under Section 304 A of the Indian 4 W.P.No.11750/2014 Penal Code which has paved way for dismissal from service; no interference is caused.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Karan Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Judgement ... on 11 February, 2014

In view of above proposition of law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in Laxmi Narayan Hayaran Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another (supra) and the fact that the petitioner has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 332 of the Indian Penal Code which has paved way for dismissal from service; no interference is caused.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results