Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 143 (0.40 seconds)

Rccpl Private Limited vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 May, 2026

12. This Court while dismissing the W.P. No. 10517 of 2026, has observed that the issue had previously arisen in cases concerning the levy of dead rent due to the non-commencement of mining activities. In that batch of cases, a similar plea was raised, namely that production could not commence due to delays in obtaining environmental clearance and permission to enter the mining areas. However, this plea was rejected by this Court in M.P. Bricks Company vs. State of M.P. & Others (W.P. No. 3601/2021, decided on 28.01.2026) and in other similar matters. Therefore, in our view, the Signature Not Verified Signed by: MANVENDRA SINGH PARIHAR Signing time: 05-05-2026 17:41:28 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:33936 6 RP-800-2026 respondents were justified in issuing the demand notice to the petitioner, failing which the Bank Guarantee/Performance Guarantee is liable to be encashed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Rccpl Private Limited vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 April, 2026

7. Similar issue arose before this Court in the cases of grant of charge of dead rent due to non starting mining activities. In the said bunch of cases, same plea was taken that due to delay in grant of environmental clearance and permission to enter into the mining areas, the production could not be started. The aforesaid plea was negatived by this Court in the case of M.P.Bricks Company Vs. State of M.P. & others, [W.P.No.3601/2021 decided on 28/1/2026] and other similar matters.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next