Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.02 seconds)

Bb Lal Aggarwal vs The State Govt Of Delhi & Anr. on 4 April, 2022

16. The present petitioner/accused had changed the counsel in between who had sought further opportunity to cross-examine CW-1. The learned trial Court had granted the said opportunity. The present petitioner/accused had chosen not to cross-examine CW-1. A coordinate bench of this Court in Sushil Ansal vs. State of NCT of Delhi Crl.M.C.2107/2021 dated 15.12.2021 had held as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 3 - T Singh - Full Document

Through vs State on 18 July, 2022

Sushil Ansal v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (supra), does not cut much ice. In the Written Submission filed on behalf of appellant Sushil Ansal, a tabular analysis is depicted to the effect that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had relied upon other documents viz., Ex. PW100/M, PW17/DB, PW69/B, PW69/CC and PW103/X­68 to find him culpable. But is not addressed is the fact that such aforesaid documents were per se for the year 1977, 1974, 1979 and 1981, whereas, the documents that were destroyed, pilfered or defaced in the instant case i.e., documents pertaining to fire clearances as also the cheques in question discussed hereinabove were pertaining to the period 1995­96 before the tragedy struck on 13.06.1997.
Delhi District Court Cites 131 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1