Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 50 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing Pradip Kumar Karak & Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 30 October, 2014

State Of West Bengal & Ors vs Subrata Chatterjee & Anr on 4 May, 2018

2. This appeal was heard analogously with MAT No. 36 of 2001 [Pradip Kumar Karak and Others--v--The State of West Bengal and Others]. The same set of Learned Advocates appeared for the respective writ petitioners and the State of West Bengal and its authorities in both the matters. Both the Appellants and the Respondents submitted jointly that the basis of the claim of the writ petitioners in both the cases was the same, and that common questions of law and fact arose in both the appeals. They prayed that the appeals be heard analogously. That is why this Court directed that the appeals be heard analogously.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - P P Banerjee - Full Document

Smt.Sumitra Singh (Chatterjee) vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 November, 2017

Mr.Ray also submits that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with Shibnath Koley, but the petitioner's case cannot be considered as per the decision of Pradip Kumar Karak & Others' case, which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court. This submission of Mr.Ray is not disputed by Mr.Yasin Ali, learned advocate appearing for the D.L.O., the respondent no.4. Mr.Ray submits that since the petitioner's grievance has not been considered as per the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore, Court may direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chatterjee - Full Document

Sri Asit Baran Banerjee vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 November, 2017

Mr.Ray also submits that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with Shibnath Koley, but the petitioner's case cannot be considered as per the decision of Pradip Kumar Karak & Others' case, which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court. This submission of Mr.Ray is not disputed by Mr.Yasin Ali, learned advocate appearing for the D.L.O., the respondent no.4. Mr.Ray submits that since the petitioner's grievance has not been considered as per the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore, Court may direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chatterjee - Full Document

Sri Uttam Kumar Ray vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 November, 2017

Mr.Ray also submits that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with Shibnath Koley, but the petitioner's case cannot be considered as per the decision of Pradip Kumar Karak & Others' case, which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court. This submission of Mr.Ray is not disputed by Mr.Yasin Ali, learned advocate appearing for the D.L.O., the respondent no.4. Mr.Ray submits that since the petitioner's grievance has not been considered as per the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore, Court may direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chatterjee - Full Document

Achintya Kumar Sahoo vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 November, 2017

Mr.Ray also submits that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with Shibnath Koley, but the petitioner's case cannot be considered as per the decision of Pradip Kumar Karak & Others' case, which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court. This submission of Mr.Ray is not disputed by Mr.Yasin Ali, learned advocate appearing for the D.L.O., the respondent no.4. Mr.Ray submits that since the petitioner's grievance has not been considered as per the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore, Court may direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - S Chatterjee - Full Document

Smt.Mamata Basu Das vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 November, 2017

Mr.Ray also submits that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with Shibnath Koley, but the petitioner's case cannot be considered as per the decision of Pradip Kumar Karak & Others' case, which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court. This submission of Mr.Ray is not disputed by Mr.Yasin Ali, learned advocate appearing for the D.L.O., the respondent no.4. Mr.Ray submits that since the petitioner's grievance has not been considered as per the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore, Court may direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - S Chatterjee - Full Document

Smt.Bharati Chowdhury vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 November, 2017

Mr.Ray also submits that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with Shibnath Koley, but the petitioner's case cannot be considered as per the decision of Pradip Kumar Karak & Others' case, which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court. This submission of Mr.Ray is not disputed by Mr.Yasin Ali, learned advocate appearing for the D.L.O., the respondent no.4. Mr.Ray submits that since the petitioner's grievance has not been considered as per the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore, Court may direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chatterjee - Full Document

Sri Tapan Kumar Ray vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 November, 2017

Mr.Ray also submits that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with Shibnath Koley, but the petitioner's case cannot be considered as per the decision of Pradip Kumar Karak & Others' case, which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court. This submission of Mr.Ray is not disputed by Mr.Yasin Ali, learned advocate appearing for the D.L.O., the respondent no.4. Mr.Ray submits that since the petitioner's grievance has not been considered as per the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore, Court may direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chatterjee - Full Document

Sri Mukta Pada Biswas vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 14 November, 2017

Mr.Ray also submits that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with Shibnath Koley, but the petitioner's case cannot be considered as per the decision of Pradip Kumar Karak & Others' case, which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court pursuant to the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court. This submission of Mr.Ray is not disputed by Mr.Yasin Ali, learned advocate appearing for the D.L.O., the respondent no.4. Mr.Ray submits that since the petitioner's grievance has not been considered as per the direction of the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore, Court may direct the respondent authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chatterjee - Full Document

Narayan Chandra Maiti vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 January, 2018

Mr. Majumder, learned Advocate, Government Pleader appears on behalf of the State and submits, the said order does not cover the situation as it is distinguishable on many points. The first point is that the said order was passed on the basis of an omission on the part of the State to bring to the notice of the said learned Judge that SLP no. 8558- 61 of 2015 (Pradip Kumar Karak & Ors. vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) was not pending as on the date of the order, the same had earlier been disposed of in the month of April, 2017.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next