Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Basawaraj S/O Sangappa Mamadapur vs The Special Deputy Commissioner on 20 February, 2013

Achala Saluja vs Union Of India & Anr on 23 March, 2016

4. That in a recent judgment passed on 08.07.2013 in LA. APP. No.66/2013 titled as Inder Singh versus Union of India & Anr. decided along with two other land acquisition appeals, this Hon‟ble Court relying upon two recent judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the cases reported as AIR 2014 SC 746; Basawaraj and Ors. Vs. The LA.APP. 584/2011 Page 4 of 21 Special land Acquisition Officer and (2014) 4 SCALE 50:
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Hari Shankar Swami vs M/O Communications on 20 February, 2024

6. It is the case of the applicant that he should have been regularised w.e.f. 20.03.1990. On the contrary, learned counsel for the respondents while relying upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Rajasthan High Court in the matter of UOI & Ors. Vs. Dr. Som Prakash Joshi [D.B.(Civil) Writ Petition No. 14742/2016] as also the judgment delivered by Hon'ble the Apex Court in the matter of Basawaraj & Anr. Vs. The Special land Acquisition Officer [reported in AIR 2014 SC 746], contended that appellant did not raise any grievance against his regularization order passed in the year 1990, therefore, appellant's claim with regard to regularisation, has already attained its finality.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Sterlite Power Transmission Ltd on 22 August, 2025

11. Learned State Commission, noticing that delay is of 40 days has refused to condone the delay while, inter alia, relying on Basawaraj & Anr vs Special. Land Acquisition Officer: (2013)14 SCC 81. It came to the conclusion that the sufficient cause could not be construed for the benefit of a party who had acted in negligent manner and on whose part, there was lack of bonafide, and taking note of reasons assigned in the application moved by the Insurance Company which merely was suggestive of procedural aspects and not indicating any sufficient cause, the delay has been refused to be condoned, which has led to the filing of the present petition.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1